@Ken226 Thank you for discovering this issue and sharing your insights. I just got done building and installing my gantry a couple days ago and I was wondering about its ability to hold squareness. It seemed like it did not take much to move the gantry out of square. I was actually looking at how I could add some rigidity to the corners of the gantry with some machined aluminum pieces. Obtaining mounting points though that are clear of all the mechanisms might be challenging.
And the gantry frame itself only has two corners, in the back. It's open in the front.
But, the squareness thing wasn't really related to those corners anyway, it was in the X axis cross rail. Since each end of the X rail is mounted on a linear bearing, each end of the X rail can move fore/aft a little, independent of the other end.
As you tighten the belts on one side, it pulls the X cross rail into a skew. Tighten the opposite belt, and it starts to correct that skew.
And theoretically, in a perfect world, if you tightened them to the exact same tension you should have an X cross rail that is perfectly perpendicular to the Y axis.
But in my case, evenly matched tension didn't quite = a perpendicular x rail. So, I decided that a squared up X rail is better, regardless of how evenly matched the belts tension. It seems to have really paid-off.
It should have been obvious to me from the beginning of this project. But, I didnt see it until I had the printer laying on its back, looking in through the top. I was like, "holy sh**, that thing looks like it melted In the sun!".