I'm sorry,
@Digger42, I should have tried to field your question a little more honestly before unpacking the sarcasm.
I think balancing chucks is a good idea in general, if the factory didn't do a good job initially first. I skipped that step with the last half dozen chucks I bought, because secondary balancing by the end-user is a disqualifier on my personal quality agenda. If it were a three jaw scroll chuck, I would have saluted and said good work, carry on. But because it was a 4-jaw independent, and independent chucks are fundamentally imbalanced, I made the comment to see if you would pick up on that fact. I made it obvious by asking if it would work under a non-symmetric part. I could have also suggested an off-center part, since the 4-jaw is how you accomplish an eccentric hole, for example. This alludes to the usage of independent chucks for deliberate off-centering or for gripping nonuniform parts. Both of these conditions are inherently out of balance and off-axis.
So what I'm saying is, I narcissistically posted to see if you catch on, and if not, I started popcorn. I apologize for using you for my own entertainment. I probably owe a lot of people around here the same spiel.