Actually, I paid a bit less than fifty bucks for it on ebay--11/5" by (in the ad) 1.25", but it was closer to 1.5" thick. The sawcuts were not straight so by the time I got it flat on both sides it was about 1.315" thick.That aluminum disc can't be cheap. How thick is that? I was looking at getting a plate around 1/4 thick and use counter sink bolts to mount it to a surface plate to get by cheaper. What do you think?
I actually leveled mine to the world and itself as that provided a good reference, place the bubble in the center. It is true that level is level to itself though. I had to use 150 pounds of lead in one corner of the lower cabinet since, I am not bolted to the foundation, to get the twist out. I had to adjust my head stock ever so slightly but I first leveled the bed, you cannot and do not want to fight the bed and the head stock at once and it took me a couple of months to get the twist out of the bed.... I suggest taking your time and being patient, you can do a lot without fine tuning it but, for me, there was/is a great deal of satisfaction in the tunning...Again, joe pie is talking about an integral head stock lathe. Things get more complicated when you have head stock alignment to deal with as well as twist. If you go chasing what you think is twist and the issue is also headstock alignment, you can be chasing your tail.
If absolute leveling is not where its at, why use a more accurate level.
I was hoping someone had experience dealing with sag, twist, AND head stock alignment.
I've spent more time over the years on telescope building sites than I have on this one so far. Those are the most awesome altitude bearings I've ever seen and they solve a lot of problems that plywood bearings have. I'll keep that in mind. I have an old Cave Astrola on an equatorial mount that I've wanted to make into a Dob for years.It's now the altitude bearing on one side of a Dobsonian-mount for an 8" Newtonian reflector telescope.
But they are heavy!Using the boss on a face plate method, runout in the faceplate wouldn't matter because the same point is being measured each time; it's just being relocated. The same method is used to square a table saw top to the blade and saw blades aren't nearly as flat as the expectations for a lathe. The dial indicator is placed on the same spot on the blade after is is rotated from toward the front of the saw and then toward the back.
I've spent more time over the years on telescope building sites than I have on this one so far. Those are the most awesome altitude bearings I've ever seen and they solve a lot of problems that plywood bearings have. I'll keep that in mind. I have an old Cave Astrola on an equatorial mount that I've wanted to make into a Dob for years.
That’s the point of facing the large surface. Eliminating the dish indicates squareness between the cross slide and the spindle.How would your cross slide squareness to the spindle axis play into this test?