- Joined
- Jun 29, 2014
- Messages
- 4,177
OK. The pointed feedback I heard on some of the document drafts:@vtcnc
Only helps a little, at this point. I'll revisit it later and maybe more will percolate through on how the "working group" is to proceed.
It seems to me that creating a lathe pre-purchase worksheet is a project that is generally considered to be a good idea.
Some (three?) draft formats have been offered, without much specific comment. Specific comments work best with me. May be intimidating to others.
Beyond that, I'm a bit lost (don't know what to do next).
IMHO, A reason those threads, as you describe, are "left to die" is because they have no specific objective or a leader.
I'm anxious for some structure and a leader. Choices need to be defined and selected. Is that's intimidating?
1) checklist may be too scripted or too narrow,
2) rating system could be helpful in offering direction,
3) open ended questions and narrative is highly desired,
Some of the sentiment I will try to summarize, but not necessarily related directly to the drafts:
4) while a step-by-step process may be the most efficient way to select a new machine, it may not be the most effective depending on communication styles, levels of experience, what does the buyer want to do with the machine, etc.? How do we have our cake and eat it too?
5) some members may just not play well with direction, how to avoid this? is there a requirement to avoid this? Or do we just do something to help make the situation better overall?
I think a grand unification effort of the draft submissions is in order. I will give it a go later and post here. Perhaps this will help with solidifying our direction and shaping next steps.
My goal will be to try and combine the best of the drafts and come up with a couple of "policy" statements we can agree on as running rules for a thread for both participants and members who want to help.