- Joined
- Jan 20, 2018
- Messages
- 5,920
I didn't either. I just clicked the Join button and I'm in. Not many members though.Just a title Jeff . FWIW , I never knew we had a FB page either . Maybe they'll let me in !
I didn't either. I just clicked the Join button and I'm in. Not many members though.Just a title Jeff . FWIW , I never knew we had a FB page either . Maybe they'll let me in !
Not a problem that it is close to the ways. There is space.
Since he is removing the outer diameter, his work holding is not bad.
If he was facing it might be dangerous, but I have faced without having the material against the face of the jaws.
I don't find it to be a dangerous or how not to moment.
So why is that any different than using the jaws from internal but not having it seated on the face of the jaws?Disagree.
When that thing comes off of the chuck, and it will, it needs somewhere to go.
As tight as that is its likely to bind between the ways and the chuck jaws, and at that moment I do not want to be in the room, let alone operating the machine.
The diameter of that part is 2-3X the size of the chuck.So why is that any different than using the jaws from internal but not having it seated on the face of the jaws?
All cutting action for this is into the chuck, not to push it back.