- Joined
- Feb 25, 2021
- Messages
- 3,271
Looks very similar to my 3k, but probably 11,000 lbs instead of 8000. Any idea of what year?K&T 4H.
Looks very similar to my 3k, but probably 11,000 lbs instead of 8000. Any idea of what year?K&T 4H.
On my list for tomorrow: cooked Christmas today and I’m beatMeasure up those jaws Chazz . I have 2 sets of jaws that look similar . If they are the same I'll bring them up to CF with me .
Looks very similar to my 3k, but probably 11,000 lbs instead of 8000. Any idea of what year?
According the vintagemachinery.org brochure matching the year of mine, the 1944 3K vertical weighs 8800 lbs. Since they appear to be exactly the same design, I have to believe the larger 4H can't weigh less the 10,000. Make sure you're looking at a reprint with the movable head, slightly earlier and the verticals didn't have ways on the head, I have to imagine that adds considerably to the weight.And the chart says it’s weighs in at 7850 pounds. Man, I thought it was heavier, especially how sore I am two days later after getting it into the shop.
According the vintagemachinery.org brochure matching the year of mine, the 1944 3K vertical weighs 8800 lbs. Since they appear to be exactly the same design, I have to believe the larger 4H can't weigh less the 10,000. Make sure you're looking at a reprint with the movable head, slightly earlier and the verticals didn't have ways on the head, I have to imagine that adds considerably to the weight.
Check to be sure you get the phases wired correctly to spin the motor in right direction according to the arrow on the motor pulley, before engaging the clutch. Apparently something in the mechanism doesn't tolerate running backwards well. Can't remember what but do remember that is an issue.
Consider starting a thread in the Kearney & Trecker sub-forum tracking your work on this machine.
@682bear & @toprecyler
It appears Bear is correct. Digging around more on vintagemachinery.org I finally found this spec sheet.
From the numbers there, the 3K and 4H vertical are very similar sized machines. The weight is nearly identical, with the 4H having a 10" more table length but fewer feed and spindle speed choices. I'd guess they are both built on the same frame castings except for the table.
Somewhat confusing as there appears to be a earlier version with a fixed head that was sold in both "3 Standard" and "4 Heavy", in which the heavy version was definitely heftier than the standard. The later H designation wasn't consistent with that standard/heavy nomenclature (??). Early marketing games?
In addition to having a 3k, the K&T factory in MIlwaukee was a landmark I remember as a kid when driving into town to visit my grandmother. It was a huge glass walled warehouse, really distinctive. As a kid I always wondered what they did there. So while I don't know much about them in general, I can very easily be prodded into digging into it.At least that is my understanding... I'm no expert, but I did some research back when I was looking for a horizontal mill.