- Joined
- Jan 20, 2015
- Messages
- 361
The double taper and slotting of the ER collets allows for much improved contact to the tool over a longer length *if* the size is less that optimal for the collet. Ball bearing nuts make higher torques easily attainable as well.Hobbyist with manual machine. I hate tool changes. Trying to speed that up and be able to set the Z height. I have not had any pull out issues with the R8 collets. Is the ER series better in that regard? Why is the ER an improvement?
Single taper R8 and 5C collets work very well if the tool/material chucked up in them is close to the nominal size of the collet. But if you have a tool/material to chuck up that is between sizes you are going to get more clamping at the end of the collet and less as you go back into the collet making it not as ridged.
So for end mills that are sized very accurately, ER is not that much of an advantage in comparison to an R8 Collet in contact or gripping power.
If your chucking up number or letter drills and the bit is off somewhat from nominal size of the collet, the ER collet will perform better.
Also note, collet run out is generally a function of cost. Crappy er collets that are abound on ebay will typically give crappy run out results. This is usually immaterial in a home shop, in a production shop running carbide tools it makes a huge difference in cost over time.
In smaller diameter tools (under 1/2") the Rule of thumb is for each addition 0,0001" additional runout your tool life will be reduced 10%
So a tool with 0.0005" runout will have half the life of one that is perfect. That is why companies will pay big money for hydraulic and shrink fit tool holders, because it saves them big money in cutting tools when your punching 100's of holes an hour.