- Joined
- Feb 1, 2015
- Messages
- 9,937
It may be my scientific background, but I've never been bothered by extra digits. Heck, I once made a frequency meter that had eight significant digits. I calibrated it to WWV, the US time standard at the time. At the time, I was setting the oscillator frequency of a digital stopwatch that I manufactured which had only five digits and would have done just fine using a six digit meter. My preferred measurement instrument for the lathe is my micrometer even though in many cases I only need accuracy to a few thousandths. You can always choose to ignore the additional resolution but if you don't have it, you can't use it when you do need it.
OTOH, As far as RPM of a lathe or mill spindle, it wasn't that long ago when you had six or so fixed speeds to choose from. My Grizzly had 150, 300, 560, 720, 1200 and 2400 OEM speeds to choose from. In most cases, a single digit would suffice. I certainly wouldn't obsess over having an RPM meter accurate to a single RPM. (and I tend to be OCD about such things)
OTOH, As far as RPM of a lathe or mill spindle, it wasn't that long ago when you had six or so fixed speeds to choose from. My Grizzly had 150, 300, 560, 720, 1200 and 2400 OEM speeds to choose from. In most cases, a single digit would suffice. I certainly wouldn't obsess over having an RPM meter accurate to a single RPM. (and I tend to be OCD about such things)