I want to be sure I understand the implications of your RPC plans.
I think you bought a 20 HP RPC (panel + idler). Correct?
Now you're talking about using a 10 HP idler?
Is it OK to run a 10 HP idler from a 20 HP panel (as is) or do you have to change any components in the panel?
You say "10HP initial idler". Does that mean you start the 10 HP idler, then after it's up to speed, you switch in the 20 HP idler, or?
So do you run both idlers continuously or switch of the 10 HP idler once the 20 HP is up to speed?
Ray,
Going to give you the long explanation to the best of my knowledge (which isn't complete).
The current panel and idler are a 20HP setup. I'm *considering* rebuilding it into a RPC with BOTH a 10 HP idler and a 20HP idler, which could be run in 10, 20, or 10+20 modes, depending on need. Right now I do not need more than 20HP of RPC idler (10HP machines) but I am considering buying and rebuilding a CNC VMC, and some of those are a bit more power hungry.
The main components of an RPC are
1) An idler
2) Contactors - Typically one for on/off, and one for the start caps
3) run capacitors
4) start capacitors
5) some odds and ends
Usually there is an input contactor which turns the incoming single phase on/off. It needs to be sized to the input current. Actually, contactors are sized by maximum throughput current and maximum switching current, and of course voltage(s). The thoughput current is basically a matter of heating up (resistance) of the guts of the contactor, and the switching current is a matter of the contacts being able to handle arcing effects on opening/closing. Due to surge currents on starting motors, contactors sometimes also have a maximum HP rating. Anyhow, within reason, an oversize contactor will not be a problem. As the existing on/off contactor is buzzing annoyingly, I'm replacing it with a quality 95amp/30HP rated contactor.
The start capacitors are a bit of a ballpark guess for the motor HP. These capacitors are connected across briefly at startup by a contactor driven through a timer circuit. The actual capacitance can be a bit of a trade off on surge startup current vs spin-up time. This capacitance is achieved by paralleling several capacitors (6 in this case).
The run capacitors are ideally "tuned" based on voltage measurements under load. This tuning varies based on the load, and to a lesser extent the actual idler motor characteristics. Again this is achieved by parallel a bank of capacitors.
Due to electro-mechanical characteristics, run capacitors and start capacitors are not interchangeable. Basically run capacitors have a 100% duty cycle. Start capacitors have a much shorter duty cycle (due to heat buildup) but for the size and cost have significantly greater capacitance (1-2 orders of magnitude). Both types of capacitors need to be able withstand AC voltage, which is a problematic constraint in capacitor design.
But the gist of all of it is that the capacitors in a fixed design don't provide great voltage control across all three phases over a wide variety of loads. And a large idler running to drive a small load is not the most efficient approach.
Since I want to fix the annoying buzz, I'm redesigning my RPC panel to accommodate some future changes, but I haven't fully committed to those. What I'd like to do is use a microcontroller (Arduino, Teensy, etc) to monitor the voltages on all three phases. Potentially using FFT's to get both voltage and phase information. Maybe throw in some hall-effect current monitoring. I have some basic circuits in mind but prototyping is needed. Based on voltage measurements I could then dynamically have the microcontroller switch in/out additional capacitance (adding or subtracting from the number of capacitors actively connected in parallel) to get the best voltage match across all three phases, using either TRIACs or power MOSFETs rather than contactors.
When this came up before, having enough CPU throughput to handle FFTs in most microcontrollers has been raised as a question. Obviously it depends to some extend on which microcontroller. But the maximum sampling rate I need to do basic phase comparisons is pretty trivial. I'd probably shoot for 480Hz over a few cycles of 60Hz, so maybe a 16 pt FFT on each leg? Actual details TBD. But the whole thing is sort of a future project.
In addition to doing dynamic capacitance adjustments, I'd set up the microcontroller to handle transitions from off-10HP-20HP-30HP modes. Still have to have the operator (me) select the mode, as it takes too long to spin up another motor to do it dynamically based on load. Might be able to do some predictive guesses based on what machines where switched on, but I don't see that as feasible. Somewhere along the line a pony motor to start an idler is also a possibility?? Power factor correction on the incoming line is also a possibility.
So, for now, fix the contactor buzz, and remote the idler to outside rather than inside with the control panel. With wiring gauges sufficient for expanded capacity if I decide to pursue that.