- Joined
- Nov 26, 2023
- Messages
- 309
I hear all of what you're saying. But again you have to listen to what they said. I wasn't there, didn't witness anything.
According to the dog's owner, the cat ran out of the yard and jumped on/attacked the pitbull.
Now if someone is inclined to believe that, I venture most people would say the dog was defending itself. The owner also claimed he tried to separate the dog from the cat or something. As I've said above it just could be what was told the police, in an effort to remove any culpability from the owner of the dog.
The cops in this town are worthless idiots to begin with. Oftentimes if no one or not more then one witness was present, the cop will just go with the story he's handed. Am I wrong?
(a final determination as to who's at fault, what's legal, what's not, depends entirely on the laws of the area. And the willingness of the prosecutor to do their job).
I think maybe I could say the dog is obviously in the category of "extra dangerous". A dog can bite a cat. But most of the time, I would think, the arm won't be crushed, broken clean apart in 2 places, and fractured again at the elbow.
I am not for torturing any animal, nor even causing one significant discomfort. But there may be the basis for a new law that says whenever an animal such as a pitbull is outdoors, it needs to have say a lightweight cage surrounding it's head. It doesn't need to be made of cast iron, simply some sort of plastic or composite material. And doesn't have to muzzle the dog either, just prevent it from getting it's teeth around anything.
According to the dog's owner, the cat ran out of the yard and jumped on/attacked the pitbull.
Now if someone is inclined to believe that, I venture most people would say the dog was defending itself. The owner also claimed he tried to separate the dog from the cat or something. As I've said above it just could be what was told the police, in an effort to remove any culpability from the owner of the dog.
The cops in this town are worthless idiots to begin with. Oftentimes if no one or not more then one witness was present, the cop will just go with the story he's handed. Am I wrong?
(a final determination as to who's at fault, what's legal, what's not, depends entirely on the laws of the area. And the willingness of the prosecutor to do their job).
I think maybe I could say the dog is obviously in the category of "extra dangerous". A dog can bite a cat. But most of the time, I would think, the arm won't be crushed, broken clean apart in 2 places, and fractured again at the elbow.
I am not for torturing any animal, nor even causing one significant discomfort. But there may be the basis for a new law that says whenever an animal such as a pitbull is outdoors, it needs to have say a lightweight cage surrounding it's head. It doesn't need to be made of cast iron, simply some sort of plastic or composite material. And doesn't have to muzzle the dog either, just prevent it from getting it's teeth around anything.