My first lathe!! Old South Bend.

I’m with ShagDog on this.
Buy an inexpensive (was gonna say cheap, but they are actually well made)import 5” 3 jaw chuck.
Money well spent.
The only downside is you will probably have to machine a new back plate then spend lots of time cleaning all of the cast iron off/out of your new lathe.
Above all, have fun
Yeah, this is the route I will go. I will fit my existing backing plate to the new chuck and then have the old one around for a rotary fixture or whatever, as someone else suggested. Thank you!
 
Well, got around to getting another chuck and fitting my existing backing plate to it.

Moving on to the tail stock and I have another question, if I may. The tail stock clamp plate that came
with it sure seems a little narrow. Did they make different sizes? Between the rails on my ways measures right about 2.18" and the clamp plate is not much wider than that. Thoughts?
 

Attachments

  • 20210513_183939.jpg
    20210513_183939.jpg
    624.2 KB · Views: 20
  • 20210513_184102.jpg
    20210513_184102.jpg
    741.2 KB · Views: 20
  • 20210513_184219.jpg
    20210513_184219.jpg
    724.9 KB · Views: 17
Moving on to the tail stock and I have another question, if I may. The tail stock clamp plate that came
with it sure seems a little narrow. Did they make different sizes? Between the rails on my ways measures right about 2.18" and the clamp plate is not much wider than that. Thoughts?

Don't worry. The prismatic ways center the tail stock, not the clamp. The clamp only provides a platform for downward pressure.

Your clamp does look a little sloppy. However, the 56N3 is the proper part for a 9" lathe.
 
I now see that your lathe is an older Workshop lathe (which predates the modern 9" lathe). Your clamp probably isn't the correct part for that lathe.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ADM
Here's a sketch from graham-xrf of his 9A lathe ways profile. Unfortunately, a lot of the important dimensions are not filled in as of yet, especially the surface 11 to surface 12 dimension, which is what you are needing.



1621005438167.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: ADM
ADM, this is the tailstock clamp from my ‘38 SB9 workshop. Fits great, I always thought it was standard, but maybe not.
My lathe is a “C”, but produced a couple yrs before SB started the A,B & C designations.
I think (?) judging from the top spindle git oilers, yours is from the same time period.
I think our lathes are the earlier “modern” models, as SB was phasing out the 9” junior (or heavy9) at this time period.
I could (of course) be wrong about all of this.
But I don’t think so.
Cheers, Harvey
 

Attachments

  • 70920797-04DC-4D30-B593-86EF6062ED8C.jpeg
    70920797-04DC-4D30-B593-86EF6062ED8C.jpeg
    1.5 MB · Views: 11
  • Like
Reactions: ADM
IMG_0002.JPG
IMG_0003.JPG

mine's a heavy 9, so 2.75" gap between ways, but the difference between the gap and the width of the raised center piece of the clamp is only 1/16", so you may have a clamp from a different lathe or model. I wouldn't worry about it unless it causes issues, like tailstock slipping or the clamp twisting as you move the tail stock.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ADM
Back
Top