- Joined
- Nov 16, 2012
- Messages
- 5,596
So sorry for the long delay. My day job has been very demanding lately.
I did a course correction and changed the shaft from a taper on the hub end to just straight. I'm "inventing" another mechanism to center the grinder hub. The idea of a steep taper on a thin diameter shaft was not sitting well with me. Quite frankly, it was just bugging me because I'm not all that crazy about friction tapers in the first place and having one on shaft less than 1" diameter was doomed for failure.
Anyhow, another precision shaft was made. When I heat treated the raw stock for the last one, I did 3 others along with it. Without stopping to take pictures and do write-up, it only takes about 45 minutes to re-make that shaft. Tolerances on this one were the same and everything is inside 1-2 tenths.
The shaft was assembled last night and a couple very simple pieces of stock were cut to serve as a precision guide while the bearings were pressed on. There was one fairly big surprise... A fairly large extra spacer was needed to supply spring pressure. My initial calculations were to put 25lbs force on the taper bearing. I calculated that much into the dimensions and also added a good bit of extra on the spring support, with the intention it could be trimmed down if needed. Instead, that extra bushing/spacer (next to the thrust bearing) was needed. Turned-out, 25lbs was nowhere near enough. The calculations and dimensions came-out right as far as I could tell but, I just miscalculated how much force is needed to keep the bearing seated. Now, the force is about 125lbs.
Here's what the assembled setup looks like:
The indicator is showing TIR inside 1.5 tenths which I suspect is mostly surface irregularities. For now, the bearings were lightly greased and a motor was rigged-up to spin it for increasing periods of time from 10, 20, 30 and 60 minute periods. No heat at all -meaning, ABEC 5 bearings are good things and also, 125lbs is not too much force. Should be fine really because that bearing should be able to handle axial load of 5,000 lbs safely.
So... Here's what I'm working on instead of a tapered shaft. The idea is conveyed in the close-up of the hub attachment assembly. I'm going to use 2 very simple tapers and hardened smooth surfaces to self-center the hub. The added complication is that a couple drive pins are needed. I might change the drive pins to a slot-type arrangement but for now, pins will do. The pins free-float in the back of hub plate.
And here are some of the prototype pieces...
So, we're in free-wheeling territory now, thinking on-the-fly -which is how most of my projects are hatched...
So, any thoughts, suggestions? I'm all ears.
Ray
I did a course correction and changed the shaft from a taper on the hub end to just straight. I'm "inventing" another mechanism to center the grinder hub. The idea of a steep taper on a thin diameter shaft was not sitting well with me. Quite frankly, it was just bugging me because I'm not all that crazy about friction tapers in the first place and having one on shaft less than 1" diameter was doomed for failure.
Anyhow, another precision shaft was made. When I heat treated the raw stock for the last one, I did 3 others along with it. Without stopping to take pictures and do write-up, it only takes about 45 minutes to re-make that shaft. Tolerances on this one were the same and everything is inside 1-2 tenths.
The shaft was assembled last night and a couple very simple pieces of stock were cut to serve as a precision guide while the bearings were pressed on. There was one fairly big surprise... A fairly large extra spacer was needed to supply spring pressure. My initial calculations were to put 25lbs force on the taper bearing. I calculated that much into the dimensions and also added a good bit of extra on the spring support, with the intention it could be trimmed down if needed. Instead, that extra bushing/spacer (next to the thrust bearing) was needed. Turned-out, 25lbs was nowhere near enough. The calculations and dimensions came-out right as far as I could tell but, I just miscalculated how much force is needed to keep the bearing seated. Now, the force is about 125lbs.
Here's what the assembled setup looks like:
The indicator is showing TIR inside 1.5 tenths which I suspect is mostly surface irregularities. For now, the bearings were lightly greased and a motor was rigged-up to spin it for increasing periods of time from 10, 20, 30 and 60 minute periods. No heat at all -meaning, ABEC 5 bearings are good things and also, 125lbs is not too much force. Should be fine really because that bearing should be able to handle axial load of 5,000 lbs safely.
So... Here's what I'm working on instead of a tapered shaft. The idea is conveyed in the close-up of the hub attachment assembly. I'm going to use 2 very simple tapers and hardened smooth surfaces to self-center the hub. The added complication is that a couple drive pins are needed. I might change the drive pins to a slot-type arrangement but for now, pins will do. The pins free-float in the back of hub plate.
And here are some of the prototype pieces...
So, we're in free-wheeling territory now, thinking on-the-fly -which is how most of my projects are hatched...
So, any thoughts, suggestions? I'm all ears.
Ray