- Joined
- May 27, 2016
- Messages
- 3,477
My thanks to all of you. Clearly @WobblyHand has used many. It's completely OK to use more than one fixing type on the same project if the aim is quality functionality. I admit I was also somewhat distracted by the sight of the seriously businesslike motor drive electronics with some thought given to the cooling
I will keep in mind the 2-lug type mentioned by @Advil for a different project. That sort is clearly uncompromising.
Good picture from @Mill Lee farm Thank you.
The second rivet nut tool in my picture (Rivet Tool1a) looks to be a near clone of the Astro Pneumatic brand in your link. At $82.32 bucks, I guess that one is the premium quality version. In my case, the initial project does not require high strength, not more than a few nuts, so I suppose I could get up to something truly cheapskate, and skip the tool altogether, but I can see that these things are useful, hence why I consider investing in something decent for future use.
The actual task
Please forgive the almost off-topic aside..
The brake splash-plate issue is from a truly bonkers bit of Mercedes rear hub design that finally afflicts the brand. The car is quality, and is long-lived enough that the brake cover plate will finally rust first. The rear hub has disc brakes, but combined in the same disc hub is a cable operated conventional drum brake that is used for the parking brake. The plate locates the drum shoes, and springs ends only. This cheap part is behind the bearing hub which is bigger diameter than the hole in the plate. You can't get it off without cutting it, or pulling off the wheel bearing hub.
To change the plate requires a seriously high force risky hub pulling operation that is unlikely to leave the axle bearings intact. They might survive OK, but are normally replaced as part of the procedure. The bearings are expensive, as is the labour cost, and all that goes with heat-fit bearing installation on a Mercedes. All this x2 (to do both sides), just to replace a cheap pressed splash plate! Anyone looking at what it costs to have this done to a older Merc will feel ill just by glancing at the price!
Of course, the folk on YouTube have a variety of work around ploys. One plan simply removes a big chunk of the plate, avoiding the critical spring anchor points. What is left does hold the springs, and locate the brake shoes, but is hardly anymore a "splash plate".
Most others require cutting through enough of the plate to allow it to be somewhat "twisted" to go over the hub, then rely on the bolts to set all straight (with a cut slot left in there). It is functional, but is not the best. The best solutions split the plate in two places, and install rivet nuts to allow them to be held together with one (or maybe two) stainless patch 1.5mm thick sheet add-ons.
Some thoughts still arising are ..
1. Should the rivet nuts be fixed into the backplate, or the patch?
2. Should the repair plate be on the outside, or the inside of the backplate?
3. I have to check carefully the space clearances, and that the bolt heads will be accessible, and will not foul any other feature.
4. Either M4 or M5 seems about right. It's overkill, but M5 (0.2 inch) feels about right.
OK - so before all you folk get to musing on how pathetic is such an endeavour, know that I think so too, and I end up wondering why is it always me having to get into such desperate stuff?
I will keep in mind the 2-lug type mentioned by @Advil for a different project. That sort is clearly uncompromising.
Good picture from @Mill Lee farm Thank you.
The second rivet nut tool in my picture (Rivet Tool1a) looks to be a near clone of the Astro Pneumatic brand in your link. At $82.32 bucks, I guess that one is the premium quality version. In my case, the initial project does not require high strength, not more than a few nuts, so I suppose I could get up to something truly cheapskate, and skip the tool altogether, but I can see that these things are useful, hence why I consider investing in something decent for future use.
The actual task
Please forgive the almost off-topic aside..
The brake splash-plate issue is from a truly bonkers bit of Mercedes rear hub design that finally afflicts the brand. The car is quality, and is long-lived enough that the brake cover plate will finally rust first. The rear hub has disc brakes, but combined in the same disc hub is a cable operated conventional drum brake that is used for the parking brake. The plate locates the drum shoes, and springs ends only. This cheap part is behind the bearing hub which is bigger diameter than the hole in the plate. You can't get it off without cutting it, or pulling off the wheel bearing hub.
To change the plate requires a seriously high force risky hub pulling operation that is unlikely to leave the axle bearings intact. They might survive OK, but are normally replaced as part of the procedure. The bearings are expensive, as is the labour cost, and all that goes with heat-fit bearing installation on a Mercedes. All this x2 (to do both sides), just to replace a cheap pressed splash plate! Anyone looking at what it costs to have this done to a older Merc will feel ill just by glancing at the price!
Of course, the folk on YouTube have a variety of work around ploys. One plan simply removes a big chunk of the plate, avoiding the critical spring anchor points. What is left does hold the springs, and locate the brake shoes, but is hardly anymore a "splash plate".
Most others require cutting through enough of the plate to allow it to be somewhat "twisted" to go over the hub, then rely on the bolts to set all straight (with a cut slot left in there). It is functional, but is not the best. The best solutions split the plate in two places, and install rivet nuts to allow them to be held together with one (or maybe two) stainless patch 1.5mm thick sheet add-ons.
Some thoughts still arising are ..
1. Should the rivet nuts be fixed into the backplate, or the patch?
2. Should the repair plate be on the outside, or the inside of the backplate?
3. I have to check carefully the space clearances, and that the bolt heads will be accessible, and will not foul any other feature.
4. Either M4 or M5 seems about right. It's overkill, but M5 (0.2 inch) feels about right.
OK - so before all you folk get to musing on how pathetic is such an endeavour, know that I think so too, and I end up wondering why is it always me having to get into such desperate stuff?
Last edited: