Thanks David. Not anything compared to your cnc plasma table, but gives me another project to work on. I've been accumulating blade stock and will need to store it somewhere/somehow.Really nice work there Bruce!
Bruce
Thanks David. Not anything compared to your cnc plasma table, but gives me another project to work on. I've been accumulating blade stock and will need to store it somewhere/somehow.Really nice work there Bruce!
Great idea. That'd be close enough if I go the digital route.@BGHansen - I just had a thought. You mentioned that it's a 16" saw. So I assume that means the diameter of the wheels is 16". A 16" wheel has a circumference of 50.27" - not too far away from 48". So if you put four equally spaced magnets on one of the wheels, used a Hall effect sensor to detect them, and told the tach there was only one tick per rotation, the RPM reading would be a close approximation to FPM.
I would not have thought of that, but you sure made it to be simple. Thanks.@BGHansen - I just had a thought. You mentioned that it's a 16" saw. So I assume that means the diameter of the wheels is 16". A 16" wheel has a circumference of 50.27" - not too far away from 48". So if you put four equally spaced magnets on one of the wheels, used a Hall effect sensor to detect them, and told the tach there was only one tick per rotation, the RPM reading would be a close approximation to FPM.
Had a busy day loading and hauling my latest acquisition.
Should we be expecting your invention output to be advanced by a couple of big loads too?