- Joined
- Feb 13, 2017
- Messages
- 2,128
There are several comments pointing you in the right direction. The first step I would take is to determine the pitch of the gears on a machines at your disposal. For example, I know the 9X19 (Horrible Fright?) lathe of yours is a Modulus 1 by 20 deg pressure angle. 20 degree teeth is more common in the U S than you think. The Modulus 1 would be 25.4 DP, for what that's worth. I have an Atlas built lathe that has 16 DP 14-1/2 degree pressure angle gears. That, along with 14DP and 28DP is a common size for older U S built machines. The Atlas milling machine uses 28 DP gears. In any case, find the pitch for a machine you have and build to that to start.
Involute gear cutters cost big bux. Period. I have a set out of China where the entire set cost less than a single U S made cutter. They may not be usable for steel, but work OK for aluminium and plastic. I'm sure they would do for learning and practising. A full set is recommended unless you are aiming for a specific gear. The cutters are limited to the number of teeth they can cut. The shape of the tooth varies as the number of teeth increase. An involute gear cutter is sized to be a perfect match for one size. It then fits more or less for the rest of its' range. At the small end, a cutter only cuts a half dozen or so pitches. Toward the high end, this does open up quite a bit. The bottom line is that a full set (8 cutters) is desirable. The Chinese set I have cost less than $60. But that was a while back, I can't speak for now.
As far as a rotary device is concerned, an indexing head would be ideal. Almost as good would be a rotary table, except when you run into odd fractional angles. But a rotary device of some sort that can be locked will be vital. I watched an interesting uTube video where the builder used a CAD program to lay out the appropriate hole pattern on paper, then glued the paper to a gear blank before machining. He then used a drill to remove a good portion of metal and the lined up an involute cutter by eye. He had built a spindle to the suitable size for what he was building that was locked by a couple of bolts. Crude but doable. . . My first thought was a pin that could be used to index from the drilled holes. But he was working under primitive conditions and made a gear that meshed all the way around. He did elegant work with primitive tooling. It can be done, just taking alittle lot longer.
.
Involute gear cutters cost big bux. Period. I have a set out of China where the entire set cost less than a single U S made cutter. They may not be usable for steel, but work OK for aluminium and plastic. I'm sure they would do for learning and practising. A full set is recommended unless you are aiming for a specific gear. The cutters are limited to the number of teeth they can cut. The shape of the tooth varies as the number of teeth increase. An involute gear cutter is sized to be a perfect match for one size. It then fits more or less for the rest of its' range. At the small end, a cutter only cuts a half dozen or so pitches. Toward the high end, this does open up quite a bit. The bottom line is that a full set (8 cutters) is desirable. The Chinese set I have cost less than $60. But that was a while back, I can't speak for now.
As far as a rotary device is concerned, an indexing head would be ideal. Almost as good would be a rotary table, except when you run into odd fractional angles. But a rotary device of some sort that can be locked will be vital. I watched an interesting uTube video where the builder used a CAD program to lay out the appropriate hole pattern on paper, then glued the paper to a gear blank before machining. He then used a drill to remove a good portion of metal and the lined up an involute cutter by eye. He had built a spindle to the suitable size for what he was building that was locked by a couple of bolts. Crude but doable. . . My first thought was a pin that could be used to index from the drilled holes. But he was working under primitive conditions and made a gear that meshed all the way around. He did elegant work with primitive tooling. It can be done, just taking a
.