- Joined
- May 27, 2016
- Messages
- 3,477
In this case, if anything like that starts to happen, and nowhere near millions, we would already have trouble. It being all open, we can rely on some (in China) to do a knock-off. For the relatively few folk at HM who might try one, we can help them, so long as we keep it simple and reasonably sure-fire.We used to say, "anyone can build a couple, but it takes skill to make millions".
I had not thought of counterfeits! Anyway, regarding analog "tweaking", I do agree. Way back, when I first started working in (military) electronics, I would eliminate all multi-turn adjustments. Not even for offsets. It either had to have too little to care about, or the thing did software self-calibration every few minutes. Digitally controlled potentiometers were my thing.(Lots of engineering!) Or our participants will use products from different lots, (or manufacturers,) or inadvertently get counterfeit parts which maybe externally indistinguishable from real ones. Causes a lot of heartache. Any way to eliminate analog tweaking in this X-RF unit is probably a good idea.
The noise immunity - either it's on or it's off. It could not last, even at 12V CMOS. There came a point where 5VTTL for computing was sucking the output of power stations, even when we went to LSTTL and FPGA arrays. Drop it to 3.3V, and then to 1.8V, and use MOSFET technology. So much closer to the noise! Getting used to "eye height" displays. Sure, one can clearly see the point where going digital, with the profligate expenditure of bandwidth, gives the advantage.This is not to say that software never has problems! Seen lots of issues. But overall, it is usually faster and cheaper to scale up production of digital designs than analog ones. That's why we see digital overtaking analog.
On that very subject, is what the link in #773 was all about.
Derek Muller (Veritasium) is sponsored, but he is completely up front about who, and why.
The Most Powerful Computers You've Never Heard Of..