- Joined
- Aug 29, 2016
- Messages
- 121
I had to loosen the grip of the half nut. It originally was set too tight in order to reduce backlash. That tightness required more torque than my closed loop 3NM stepper could reliably give me. It is the backlash that is my problem. I can not put a larger stepper in because they are too slow and mechanically difficult for the WM210V that I have. I am using a controller similar to the Numobams. I just do not have the time/patience to generate my own controller. For most of what I machine the lathe holds 0.1 mm TIR so I am okay. I was not anticipating having to make my designs tolerate 0.5mm on the x axis but that is required with the current state of the lathe in auto mode. Manual mode with my DRO I get 0.1 mm.If the system stopped shy of the target position that would generally indicate the available torque was insufficient. Leadscrews have a lot of stiction and friction and thus may require a lot of torque, hence CNC systems generally use ballscrews. Perhaps cleaning and lubrication might be sufficient, or moving to a higher torque stepper or changing belt or gearing ratios. Adjusting the half nuts could also help reduce friction. Converting the Lathe to ballscrews and adding a multidimensional control is more than an ELS, it is really a CNC that uses something other than gcode. Whatever works for the operator is good. Programming is programming, whether gcode or something else.
I'm planning to CNC the mill eventually, but just do an ELS on the lathe. However I find that it generally takes about 3 iterations to finalize a design so that I'm satisfied with it, and in a sense we are in a short production run. I really enjoy the 3d printer's ability to make another copy with changes. The design tools make the gcode so I rarely get into that level of detail. Not being able to easily make another part causes us to either mod the first one or just make do with a less than satisfying design.
Last edited: