- Joined
- Dec 3, 2013
- Messages
- 1,848
Could it be your cavity cutter? I think if you cut the tool like a single-flute reamer you may be able to keep the groove definition. I didn't realize the first read through that you removed a lot of material from the back side of the cutter for clearance. How is the roundness? Looks like you did a good job with the mold blocks, I imagine they're going to come out nice and round.
I tried re-cutting the cavity and discovered some errors on my part. First, when I did the initial plunge cut I failed to account for the DRO being set for diameter and did not account for that so the minimum bore was cut over size from the get go. This explained for the loss in definition of the grooves but did not account for the cavity being under size. When re-cutting I also found the relief grind toward the base of the bullet was not deep enough and interfering not allowing the cutter to engage further. It also flared the base of the mold.
At that point I took a good look at the cutting tool and re-honed the edge, improved the relief and did some fine detailing with a rotary tool to improve the cutting edge. After that I cut another cavity. This time I paid better attention to how the cutter was performing and found that with the large neutral rake cutting edge the cutter has about .002 of spring. This time I ran the final cut several times allowing for the spring of the tool until no additional material was removed and I could feel the cutter just starting to make contact at the final dimension. During the final dimension cuts I would let the cutter dwell on the part for 2-3 minutes at a time before clearing, cleaning, lubing and repeating. I did that about eight times I think before I felt it was fully cut. I didn't have time to cast any last night so I will try today and if it is still under size I now have a better feel on how much more I would need to cut.
Here is the second cavity. You can see the groove definition is much better.