Bizarre Work Package We Were Asked To Bid On

Buffalo21

H-M Supporter - Gold Member
H-M Supporter Gold Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2018
Messages
1,040
We got a bid package from a Korean/Chinese/French/Indian (?) electronic consortium, or finance/electronic consortium, asking us to bid on some boiler/boiler room project, that’s part of a almost complete plant update. our part of the package, covers 41 pages, the work practice guideline was 83 pages. Some of the work rules are bizarre, to say the least.

The list of does and don‘ts, is massive, it like the customer wants to micro manage, every aspect of the actual work being done.

Forbidden tools

Leathermen or similar tools
No adjustable wrenches
No interchangeable tip screwdrivers
No Channel-locks or pliers
No wooden handled tools (shovels, pickaxe, rakes, brooms or hammers, etc) No wood on site, except for a few detailed exceptions
No battery powered tools (flashlights are acceptable, as long as they are orange plastic)
No Magnesium tools or products

All test tools and related equipment, must be calibrated, and certified less than 90 days before the job start, then every six month, there after.

All screwdrivers, must be electrically insulated type (2 acceptable brands)

All 5 gallon pails must be clearly labeled, to their content. If use to carry tools or hardware, they must be labeled as such

All wooden cribbing, must be painted red, and labeled as cribbing,

No tobacco or product on site, also no alcohol, drugs or weapons

All vehicles that use facility parking lots, need back up alarms, revolving light working, anytime the engine is on, a warning flag on all corners of the vehicle.
There is a unregulated parking lot about 1/2 mile away, but there are shuttle buses, on roughly 15 minute cycles. On facility property, hard hat, safety glasses, safety vest (no t shirts) and safety shoes, must be worn by all in a parked or moving vehicles.

random drug testing at least once a month

They list only 3 acceptable style/brand work shoes, you have to wear one specific hard hat design, color based on trade or company

Only 3 types of safety glasses (unless prescrption)

You have to wear gloves (only 2 acceptable models) at all times, except at break/lunch (in defined areas) and in the bathroom (while standing on line to use the portajohn, gloves need to be on)

All chemicals need to be preapproved, no Teflon tape, only one brand of electrical tape is acceptable, likewise only specific brand and color zip-ties.

Ths just a sample of the requirements, after reading the bid package for about 45 minutes, my boss, decided not to bid the job. Finally sanity prevailed. I gave up after about 6-7 pages. According to the boss, hot work, step ladder/lift usage and electrical work, each have multiple page appendix(s), not part of the basic work practice paperwork.
 
Wow, when I did telecom work the rules were no where near that strict.
Insulated screwdrivers were mandatory but no other tool restrictions.
I wonder if the no battery tools is because of fear of battery fires (which spread to your magnesium tools...)?
 
The rules sound extremely stiff, but may be necessary for the type of product they are making, or the threat of contamination or fire. In most food plants, wood, glass and some types of metal tools are prohibited. No tools that could loose parts, or causes cuffing or chipping on sanitary piping or near open product zones are allowed. Tobacco products are forbidden in almost any place consumer products are made as well as places that might have highly combustible ingredients.

The list of prohibited solvents, adhesives, and chemicals is huge. In most places only preapproved ones are allowed in. I don't think the rules are specific to who owns the company, but rather to the industry and the government entities and inspectors that control the practices in the work place.
 
Each one of those probably came from a critical incident review. When I was working for Dow agroscience (Corning) prior to the merger with Dupont a lot of the rules look familiar, the exact tool for the job, no improvising(adjustable) tools, gloves came from IA claims, etc.
 
Each one of those probably came from a critical incident review. When I was working for Dow agroscience (Corning) prior to the merger with Dupont a lot of the rules look familiar, the exact tool for the job, no improvising(adjustable) tools, gloves came from IA claims, etc.



I was thinking the same thing. Back when I was racing, there was the occasional rule that everyone mocked as being totally absurd. Later on it dawned on me that the rule didn't come out of thin air. I would think about what someone had done to cause that rule to be written in the way it was.


I then used the insight to come up with creative ideas that forced then to write some new "absurd" rules.
 
I've bumped into many of those rules & been responsible for some others. A lot of the rules I enforce don't make a lot of sense to contractors not familiar with working in a certain environment such as a data center. For the ones that are your 80 pages are probably 79 1/2 pages worth of business-as-usual.

Specifying certain products such as tape or chemicals ensures the contractors don't use sub-standard low quality materials that will become a maintenance nightmare down the road.

In turn I've scratched my head a few times when dropped into an industry I'm not familiar with such as power plants. I know of at least three fires started by people doing the wrong-for-this-place-thing that is SoP every place else they've been for 30 years; I don't blame the contractors for this, I blame the companies that didn't ensure the contractors were properly briefed & supervised.
 
Employee health, and safety department. Everyone was deputized to be the HOA president, and point out safety issues, and lapses in procedures. :)
 
The list of does and don‘ts, is massive, it like the customer wants to micro manage, every aspect of the actual work being done.
wrong.jpg


:)
 
Back
Top