Apple Charging Station

I have never read or studied USB-C. However, it is pretty universal that one wire will carry power and another will be the ground. The other wires are for signals. In an old style A connector, there are 4 terminals (wires). However, the letters probably stand for something like "Universal Serial Bus". Which means that the signal is a serial cable, where one wire carries the information as a string of binary voltages as a function of time. In old "serial cables" there was a wire that carried the signal out and a second wire that provided an acknowledgment signal back. However, simply thinking this way is probably not sufficient as it does not explain an audio signal which is analog voltages. In some cables there are electronics built in to act as an intermediary. However, if you only had 1 to 2 splitter and no audio then I think you can be pretty sure that the wires are all just wire and no electronics inside.

As far as multiple charging is concerned, as long as your wall charger can put out lots of current then there should not be a problem with having a two devices receiving power. However, I suspect that if you were trying to provide the same signal to two devices without any intermediate electronics a more complicated device would be required.

There are bus systems where all of the devices are connected along a single cable. Here handshaking is required to tell which device to listen to the transmitter. Handshaking is basically like an address that is sent first and each device has a unique address. Think of this like the old party line phone system where there was only one wire. When someone wanted to call you they would ring a certain number of rings (your address) so that you would know the call was for you and you would pick up the receiver. The other folks who also had phones connected to this single line could hear the number of rings and so knew the call was not for them. So they did not pickup the receiver. Everyone shared one line and were suppose to be polite and not "listen in" to the conversations that were not for them! Wow! Days gone by when people were polite!

Why don't you just spend a little money and get a wall charger that has multiple outputs. Google the phrase "multi port usb wall charger"
 
  • Like
Reactions: rwm
USB-C isn't a good candidate for a splitter, because the power delivery scheme identifies which of the
two ends is delivering power, and how much power, and at what voltage, in a kind of negotiation.
Two-party negotiations can deal with the problems of two parties, but that kind of
negotiation isn't suitable for a four-ended cable.

A USB-C setup that doesn't have any negotiation (maybe a USB-C to a dumb USB-A power tap)
only delivers power at 5V, maybe 500 mA limited. One of my adapters also negotiates to 9V 1.67A
with a USB-A connector on one end, and USB-C on the other.
USB-C on both ends has more options than that.
 
So right now, I have two separate USB-C cables that plug into a single "power brick" that has 2 USB-C outputs. I think that came from Amazon. Is this safer than a splitter or the same problem? Should I just use two separate power bricks on a power strip? It seems to work fine but in the long term I don't want to damage my batteries. Also, since this is going through the wireless charging pads it would be regulated by that system and I am not sure it could damage the battery? It could potentially damage the charging pad?
 
I have two separate USB-C cables that plug into a single "power brick" that has 2 USB-C outputs. I think that came from Amazon. Is this safer than a splitter or the same problem?
This power supply should not have a problem driving two USB ports. This is what it is designed for.

@whitmore , Yes the type C is considerably more complex and than A or B and has a lot more wires/contacts.
 
Back
Top