I have a project in mind that may take some parts smaller than what I’d do on my 12x36.
But mainly it’s just a sickness….
As it happens, both of my machines (C'man 12X36 and Grizzly 9X19) have the same spindle nose, 1-1/2X8 and MT3. Not really happenstance, I sorta browsed looking for common points when I acquired the C'man. Because so much of my work is small for my model building, I have "devised" a number of adaptors to use chucks and fixtures from my UniMat DB-200. Of particular interest is the 3 inch (75mm?) 3 and 4 jaw chucks. In addition, I had stumbled across another 3 jaw threaded for M12X1 with a MT2 shank. All of these have adapters dedicated for MT3 on the spindle. Some home brew, some bought. In every case, using the big machines is seemingly more difficult, but overall so much easier that I have "disposed" of the UniMat and a 6X12 Chinese machine. (ie: they were sold off)
The UniMat wouldn't cut threads so easily, requiring pattern pieces. And the 6X12, well, I have the same capabilities in a 9X19, so why bother. The 6X12
is small, but not so small I can use it at my desk. Mostly because of the plethora of tooling that goes along with it. Using the "big" machines for small work took some getting used to, but they hold the same, or better, tolerances than the small machines. What tooling I keep at my desk is so I don't need to run next door for a 3 square Swiss warding file or to drill a 1/2 millimeter hole.
Is it a sickness, I suppose so. To me, it's an obsession. Which to a "shrink" is a sickness. But then I think of "experts" as has beens under pressure. (ex spurts) A "sickness" I welcome. . .
.