- Joined
- Feb 1, 2015
- Messages
- 9,992
The most accurate method of tramming a mill is to use an offset indicator in the spindle. Regardless of any runout issues, the indicator is necessarily rotating around the spindle axis so the indicator tip traces a path in a plane perpendicular to the spindle axis. Resolution is as good as the resolution of your indicator. The issue of the non-parallel table does exist in this method and it also would exist using a cylindrical square.I don't have a cylinder square, just a regular machinist square. I'll mount an indicator on the headstock and run the Z axis up and down the square to see if the needle moves. Unless I'm misreading your post.
If you have a fixed spindle as the Tormach has, the spindle axis must be aligned parallel with the z axis ways AND the z axis ways must be perpendicular to the x and y axis ways. As Robert said above, it is possible to align then so two offsets cancel and the tram is perfect.
My round column mill/drill, on the other hand, has a movable quill and for all intents and purposes the head is stationary. Tramming can only be accomplished by shimming the column. If you have a mill where the head can be rotated in the x-z plane, You could tram in the x direction by adjusting the angle of rotation. You could also do so by shimming the column but it would be ridiculous to do so. If your mill has nod capabilities, you can adjust y direction tram in the same way.