- Joined
- May 4, 2015
- Messages
- 3,583
Hey brave65' have a question ,how long is an [ ever] , ha just funnin , but ya never know right an ever could be a lifetime.
*Old* electrolytic capacitors, as in pre-WWII, did dry out in storage (they dried out even faster in use). However, I have electrolytics from the 1970s in my junk collection upstairs that are as good as new. The start cap in the static converter on my mill came out of a thirty year old air conditioner that had sat in my machine shed for at least a decade.Motors can also be rated in starts per hour. The big boys I work with (4160 nominal Volts) generally get 2 start/restart tries before a mandated 20+ minute cooling period. For your lathes 5-10 starts over a 10 minute time is probably okay if you unload your spindle every time and let it run 10 minutes or so after. Running pumps cooling air through or over it. This is why you always start your lathe with the spindle disengaged...the extra time to spin up the extra mass is all going to greater heat in the starting circuit and motor windings. A 1.15 service factor motor helps, as does a larger Hp motor. Most of this is beyond the scope of out little 1/3-1 Hp motors on our Atlas lathes, but some of the big boys y'all may also work with will want to consider this.
Heat is the #1 enemy of electrical parts. Bar none. Electrolytic caps dry out faster with use as they are warmer. The reason for the myth of the 'dry out in storage' is time...some time during storage it dried out that last bit to fail, in use it would have died even sooner, but it wasn't being used so no one noticed. In other words, it may have died in 1 year from last use if still in weekly service, it did die in year 3, but wasn't turned on until year 5 so 'that electrolytic cap dried up from non-use'!
In doing some reading on the subject, I discovered that apparently the Japanese company, Rubicon, reintroduced wet electrolytics in the 1990's in an attempt to reduce ESR. Because they didn't get the formula right, it led to a rash of exploding capacitors in the early 2000's. My electronics experience goes back several decades and I, like you, thought that wet electrolytics went out before WW II.There is, or was, an online video from a large capacitor manufacturer in the US, showing the etching and forming process. It involves large rolls of aluminum foil and heated tanks of electrolyte. The formed foil is then wound into capacitors.
I presume the improved lifetime of modern electrolytics is due to increased purity of the aluminum, rather than "drying out." Certainly modern electrolytics show far less leakage current than older ones. Electrical leakage is from defects in the dielectric layer.
There may have been some liquid-filled electrolytics made post-war but if so, they weren't common. Military gear never used them at all, I presume because they wouldn't work at Arctic temperatures and in all positions. Their advantage was mainly in home radios where they would absorb the voltage surge at turn-on.
The Rubicon caps worked fine. The ones that popped were made by Chinese companies that tried to copy them but bungled the formula.In doing some reading on the subject, I discovered that apparently the Japanese company, Rubicon, reintroduced wet electrolytics in the 1990's in an attempt to reduce ESR. Because they didn't get the formula right, it led to a rash of exploding capacitors in the early 2000's. My electronics experience goes back several decades and I, like you, thought that wet electrolytics went out before WW II.