- Joined
- Mar 26, 2018
- Messages
- 2,719
Nice work! I remember those soft ride bikes, there was a lot of inventiveness early on in road bike design.
Rather than triangulating with the soft ride beam/ saddle I would suggest making a bracket that triangulates with the down tube or futher up the seatstays (above the brakes?). That beam is designed to flex to provide a measure of suspension, so if you hit a bump it'll force your panniers backwards. You can potentially have alot of weight high up on a relatively flexible platform so think about that when you design the rest of it. You may be fine in a straight line, but any sharp maneouveres (crazy dog, pothole etc) will have the back of the bike wagging the front around like crazy.
Also try and get the rack as low and far forward as you can get it, while still clearing the tire and your feet. Mudguards wouldn't be a bad idea either as riding in the rain is not much fun, but it's even less fun when you're getting soaked front and rear from road spray.
I think the bike is really cool. The wheels are pretty close together which makes is not the most stable, but after a year of riding it, I don't notice it much. Pretty comfortable to ride, and while not a full carbon bike, it is pretty light. I paid $200 for it so I am pretty happy.
That is an interesting design point. The rack and clamps are rather robust so I don't see it leaning sideways much, but with some weight in there, maybe it will more. I was hoping that the connection to the seat beam would only keep the rack from leaning forwards or backwards and any flex in the beam would cause flex in the steel straps. Yeah, maybe it would move the rack a little but wouldn't matter much.
I think I'm going to put a hold on the Softride right now and get the other bike ready. In the long run, having the rack option might be nice and I'll leave my custom brackets in place.