- Joined
- Mar 20, 2017
- Messages
- 25
I have an older Atlas... 12 x 24 101 07403 model... 3/8 bed material... Love the old machine and am not sure what anyone is talking about when it comes to any "flexing" while cutting.. I swear that is some point made 60 years ago by someone trying to sound like they knew what they were talking about...and people have repeated it with no evidence of it.. as at the speed I cut at there has never once been any thread or shaft that has any mishape to it due to any flexing not at all. Anyway I digress.... (Newbie remember... I do actually have a question...) I have however been very been disappointed that I could not pass a barrel through the spindle that was larger than the ... 25/32 bore would allow. So recently an opportunity came up for me to buy a much larger Atlas 12 x 36 model 111 "War lathe" Industrialised, in comparison to the 101.... Heavy V rails 7-1/2" wide All 1/2" material everything beefed up and about 130% in overall size and weight. I am totally surprised that they still used that same Shaft and timkin Bearing spindle... They still have that same 25/32 pass through in this much larger machine.... ? I am past trying to understand why other than production costs.... So I got looking at it closer and considering I only need 7/8 of an inch... It seems to me there is plenty of thickness on this spindle to bore out just 1/16th".... I'd have the 29/32 I am after and all would be right with the world... Right? .... And I just do not see any way removing just 1/16th would weaken anything enough to cause problems.. So I wonder if anyone ever tried this? That is my question..... and I do beg forgiveness in advance. This could be sacrilege to suggest it or even dangerous if there is some engineering principle other than conjecture against trying this. Thanks for any input.