- Joined
- Mar 21, 2013
- Messages
- 4,120
Maybe so but it's a good one. How do you know your DRO is accurate? How many times do you check your DRO?
You have used the dials and know how to use them and for this reason you put your trust in the DRO. If you were never allowed to use the dials and only knew DRO methods you would be lost? Perception is what you know today or knew when you used the slide rule, but education changed this. Some opinions are misguided perceptions based on lack of education. Education is the force that constantly changes perceptions and opinions.
A piece of swarf on the dial isn't going to change the accuracy of x or y but the same isn't true if the swarf is on the scale of your DRO.
I used gauge blocks to test the accuracy of my magnetic scales after installation. I've never even looked at the dials on my 935 to be honest with you. And so far (knock on wood...) I've had zero issues with swarf.
I'm not going to trust the tolerance stackup of a stamped dial+shaft+nut+leadscrew interface to gauge absolute position or a translation along an axis. But that's just me. Without the DRO and scales, I've used dial indicators and other mechanical measurement methods to give some level of accuracy to my work. The scales also give me both absolute positional data from a measured/known reference as well as translation along a axis, without all the jury-rigging necessary to use other contrivances. Seems to have worked well so far for what I do.
True, I learned to machine counting dials, and you have a valid point about perceptions. But having used dials doesn't give me trust in my scales. Hardly. I don't trust anything, and measure to make sure. But, measurements are only as accurate as the device taking the measurement so that must be taken into account as well.