- Joined
- Dec 25, 2011
- Messages
- 10,552
OK. According to the nameplate photo, the Model Number is 109.20630. According to the Sears catalogs, it was made 1947/48. Although something that I read today claimed to have a price sheet from 1945, so maybe they re-started as soon as the War ended but didn't print the first Power Tools catalog until 1948.
I don't do metric, or at least not at Midnight. The diameter of the open end of the tailstock ram according to Lionel Weightman's reverse engineered drawings should be 0.356". Machinery's Handbook says that it should be 0.3561". If that appears to be the diameter of yours right at the end, then it is 0MT (number zero Morse taper). According to M.H., the diameter at the small end should be around 0.252". According to Weightman's drawing, the tailstock ram is drilled through 0.3125" (5/16"). So the taper is short, but that just means that a little less of the length of the arbor will be in contact with the ram. It still takes a 0MT arbor.
FWIW, at least according to Weightman, on the headstock spindle the large end wasn't opened up quite to the standard, no doubt to strengthen the spindle nose. However, the taper still matches 0MT.
I don't do metric, or at least not at Midnight. The diameter of the open end of the tailstock ram according to Lionel Weightman's reverse engineered drawings should be 0.356". Machinery's Handbook says that it should be 0.3561". If that appears to be the diameter of yours right at the end, then it is 0MT (number zero Morse taper). According to M.H., the diameter at the small end should be around 0.252". According to Weightman's drawing, the tailstock ram is drilled through 0.3125" (5/16"). So the taper is short, but that just means that a little less of the length of the arbor will be in contact with the ram. It still takes a 0MT arbor.
FWIW, at least according to Weightman, on the headstock spindle the large end wasn't opened up quite to the standard, no doubt to strengthen the spindle nose. However, the taper still matches 0MT.