- Joined
- Nov 24, 2014
- Messages
- 3,598
With 3-in-1 machines, you spend most of your effort/time/money accommodating the limitations of the machine rather than just making parts.
Improving/accommodating the machine can be a satisfying hobby in itself, if that floats your boat.
If you had a different hobby in mind, hold out for the best machines you can afford/house/tool.
Let me put it this way, 3-in-1 machines are not consistent with my understanding of the Swiss reputation/stereotype.
On the other hand, trying to make parts on a 3-in-1 will teach you MANY lessons and everybody's got to start somewhere.
EDIT: What you want to make is a major factor in choosing machines.
If you intend to work with relatively easy to machine materials (aluminum, brass, plastics) in small sizes (less than 1/4 of the machines dimensional capacity) a 3-in-1 might get you started (sort of).
What type of parts do you have in mind?
What Materials?
What sizes?
What tolerances?
Improving/accommodating the machine can be a satisfying hobby in itself, if that floats your boat.
If you had a different hobby in mind, hold out for the best machines you can afford/house/tool.
Let me put it this way, 3-in-1 machines are not consistent with my understanding of the Swiss reputation/stereotype.
On the other hand, trying to make parts on a 3-in-1 will teach you MANY lessons and everybody's got to start somewhere.
EDIT: What you want to make is a major factor in choosing machines.
If you intend to work with relatively easy to machine materials (aluminum, brass, plastics) in small sizes (less than 1/4 of the machines dimensional capacity) a 3-in-1 might get you started (sort of).
What type of parts do you have in mind?
What Materials?
What sizes?
What tolerances?
Last edited: