- Joined
- Feb 1, 2015
- Messages
- 9,938
I see little difference in having a designated location for a chuck key and having a holder with an interlock switch to prevent operation of the lathe with a key in the chuck. One additional feature is if you are working around the chuck, having the interlock provides extra security. My Grizzly lathe is fairly safe with its switches up high on the headstock and having to rotate the switch to the forward or reverse position but my Atlas/Craftsman 6" has a lever on the reversing drum switch that is mounted at hip height and could easily be activated accidentally.
I try to make it a practice to never leave the key in the chuck but I have to confess that I have done so. It usually happens when I am removing something from the chuck and am engrossed in thought and forget to remove it. When I look over and see it there, I pull it out and stow it but for the time it is there , a dangerous condition exists. Requiring the proper storage of the key to prevent activation would eliminate that danger.
With growing concern over industrial safety, LOTO (lock out tag out) procedures have become common. I have had to write a few procedures myself. They are intentionally redundant and many times a pain to use. Their purpose is clear, however. Just putting a warning in a user manual to disconnect a machine from power or training personnel in safety procedures is not sufficient to ensure accident prevention. People get distracted and accidents can happen.
Just my 2 cents.
Bob
I try to make it a practice to never leave the key in the chuck but I have to confess that I have done so. It usually happens when I am removing something from the chuck and am engrossed in thought and forget to remove it. When I look over and see it there, I pull it out and stow it but for the time it is there , a dangerous condition exists. Requiring the proper storage of the key to prevent activation would eliminate that danger.
With growing concern over industrial safety, LOTO (lock out tag out) procedures have become common. I have had to write a few procedures myself. They are intentionally redundant and many times a pain to use. Their purpose is clear, however. Just putting a warning in a user manual to disconnect a machine from power or training personnel in safety procedures is not sufficient to ensure accident prevention. People get distracted and accidents can happen.
Just my 2 cents.
Bob