- Joined
- Aug 7, 2013
- Messages
- 655
Agreed, Ken. When I first learned it, it seemed ridiculously restrictive. Now that I understand it, it actually makes parts easier to make that function. That really is what drove the system into existence. You gain tolerance, overall, when using it. It may not seem like it at first, but it does allow more latitude that you simply could not express in conventional X,Y tolerancing, for example. You couldn't say, put this hole HERE, but if it happens to be on the high side, it doesn't have to be exactly there, so the +/- 0.010 location doesn't really apply. That location had to be, out of necessity, the worst case location error given that the hole may end up on the low side. It can be intimidating to learn if you try to take it on all at once, but it is a good system, IMO.
At one time I kind of understood GD&T. I took a company paid class. Some of it, when I think it through, make sense.
Talk about putting too tight of tolerances on something. I was designing a fixture to hold down a part so a robot could put potting epoxy in. They wanted to automate the process instead of having someone try to get the correct amount of epoxy in every time. Anyways, back to the story.... I designed the fixture to have an arm that hinged down over the part that was forked. A toggle clamp held down the arm. The engineers called out tolerancing on the sheet metal arm in the tenths! These guys were used to tolerancing stamping dies for hard drive arms. They got notified that things probably could be loosened up a little (a lot) bit.