I would use that cutter as the last operation on that surface, as in example A, if I could. The overall geometry of the part will determine which way I would go, but that would be my starting preference.
Now we understand. Option A is the only logical way to do this. Also as someone pointed out to do it on both sides with a radius cutter rather than do top and bottom with one cutter. Some smaller machines will tend to chatter more with the larger cut.
And to add one more thing to think about .... The concave cutter will be less useful in the future than a radius cutter. If you had to buy a cutter for this part, it would be a better investment to buy the radius cutter.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.