- Joined
- Feb 8, 2014
- Messages
- 11,176
Consider that you are probably not going to be doing work for NASA, so a small amount of error is not likely to significantly affect the end product. The place where this does become a problem is in a bearing pocket or something like that. Even with my mill that has 1 micron magnetic scales on the table and is thus self correcting, I normally pocket bearing bores undersize and bore to the final dimension. I have to do this because I have a small amount of backlash in my Y axis, about 0.002, so I can count on a pocket to be about 0.001 out of round.
It is possible in Mach3 to ''map'' the leadscrews to correct for errors over the length, but I'm not convinced that this works very well.
The most important thing in my estimation is: Can the machine return to 0,0,0 consistently after an operation? If you lose your ''0'' position then you have no idea where you are at.
.
.
It is possible in Mach3 to ''map'' the leadscrews to correct for errors over the length, but I'm not convinced that this works very well.
The most important thing in my estimation is: Can the machine return to 0,0,0 consistently after an operation? If you lose your ''0'' position then you have no idea where you are at.
.
.