I've been planning to get a CNC for a while. But I finally made a firm decision and am downsizing my astrophotography gear. I'm planning to use the funds to purchase a CNC machine. I've gone through a lot of analysis looking at Bridgeport-style, converting my Series 1, and some of the high-end machines (Haas, etc.). After weighing a lot of options, I decided that something in the low/middle of the road was probably best for me. I'm not really interested in starting from scratch (like a conversion). I don't have the funds nor ceiling height for something like a Haas Mini-mill.
So I had decided on a Tormach. I consider it sort of a half-way DIY machine. Off the bat, it sounds great. ~$9k for a 3 axis CNC machine. But start adding a stand, tooling, vises, a 4th axis, shipping and tax, and now you're at the $20k mark. I was just wondering what others had done in this decision process.
This might not be the right frame of mind, but I'm thinking that by the time I get around to buying some of the accessories for the machine that the machine provider won't be in business, or will have moved on to a new generation machine. So buying it all up-front is a little insurance.
I'm definitely tired of thinking about all the scenarios. But does it make sense to spend $20k on a Tormach? Any thoughts?
Eric
Eric... Finally have some time to respond more thoroughly...
I resisted CNC for the longest time but realized my business was suffering w/o it. For me, a conversion was out of the question; time and space to do the work being the biggest factor. Also, CNC is much harder on the ways and most manual mills lack hardened ways. A one-shot lube system is a requirement and I didn't want to spend that much time completely disassembling a machine to drill/tap 2" of cast iron. I also considered the higher end units but power requirements were too great for the circumstances at the time. I also looked at the small mills but, I know they simply struggle, get beat-up fast -and can't do the work my shop needs to produce.
At the time, I also knew I would not be doing high production... I just needed to make a few handfuls of parts that are one step up in complexity too difficult to do manually. I settled on the unit mentioned earlier because I have the manual version of that mill -and it's a known workhorse and fits my work envelope.
If you have prior knowledge of CAD and CAM, that machine is totally plug and play. I wrote the user guide for it which gives you step-by-step setup instructions and many people have commented their amazement that everything works perfectly. The problems you'll likely hear are attributable to either or both a lack of prior foundation CAD/CAM and/or basic machining.
I cut parts with that machine and most everything comes out within a thou (0.001") of spec. It's been rock solid and I had one job that kept it running 10 hours a day for two weeks. -Not a single hiccup.
The weak points:
I don't like the pendant that comes with it and for 160 bucks, upgraded to this:
http://vistacnc.com/b07_pendant_P1/pendant_p1A-S.htm It makes all the difference in the world and I now find myself using the CNC mill and just doing simple manual parts controlling with the pendant.
Mach 3: Mach 3 works and does what it's supposed to but, it's poorly documented. The existing documentation just rambles and is several versions out of date. After reading the documentation 25 times and watching countless YouTube videos, I learned enough to make it do what it's supposed to. You will need a decent (and dedicated) host computer to run Mach 3 -and that's to be expected. I put together an Intel Atom dual-core board with a low-end version of Windows 8 and it's more than adequate (by a factor of 5 or more). I have discovered that Mach 3 has it's quirks so, erring on the side of caution, I kill and restart the program frequently. It has never caused a problem -because I proactively manage it's good behavior.
I have been looking for another controller for it (for my purposes and for Matt at Precision Matthews) but, it adds $1500 to the cost -and it seems the general market-place would rather take their chances on Mach 3.
... The machine is very useful. In one job alone, it paid for itself and all the software too. Aside from a leaking oil line coupling (replaced with a 99 cent part from the hardware store) it hasn't had a single problem. It enables me to make parts I wouldn't dream of making on a manual machine -and I have strong background in manual machine operation. I honestly hate to admit this and many people here will be disappointed but, "I'm a CNC convert" now.
Ray