What would make them unstable? Disregarding manufacturing tolerances, it doesn't look like the part should be able to move once the vice is tightened, right? Once all of the smaller jaws are locked to the part, the larger jaws couldn't turn; not unless the part is small enough that the two large jaws had closed down so that they were rotating around the same central point, I would think. So you couldn't index a back jaw and know that your part was aligned with that once the jaws were closed or anything, but what would keep you from using parallels for horizontal alignment and then moving the entire vice while indicating the workpiece itself before locking the vice down to a table? If that were done, am I missing something that would still screw it up?Pretty much useless for machine work, I think; nearly all machine work calls for accurate alignment of the workpiece, I do not see how that could be achieved by that device. Someone observed that they may have been used for holding work for manual engraving.
That would be a neat little project to make.
I'm sure Adam didn't pay a dime for his.If you have a lot of money like Adam Booth you could spring for one of these.
ADAPTIX™ by Norgren
Norgren is a world leader in motion and fluid control technologies, delivering exceptional solutions which improve our customers' equipment.www.norgrenworkholding.com