- Joined
- Jul 30, 2022
- Messages
- 33
Hi all,
I'm completely new to machining, so keep that in mind when I ask silly questions or make false assumptions please.
I bought a 1950s SB 10k at an estate sale this year. Because the previous owner was deceased and I couldn't get history on it, I picked up a guide to renovation on eBay and disassembled it to clean it and replace felts. I followed the manual closely for disassembly and reassembly. It's back together now and everything works.
The problem is that I think the spindle is too far out of true. With a dial test indicator on the flange, I get a variance of .0085 when I turn the spindle. When I put a piece of small round stock in the chuck, I get .0055. As mentioned, I'm no expert, but this seems like a lot to me, even for hobby stuff.
Some questions: this is too much variance, right? Anyone know the cause/solution? Seems like the spindle would have to be egg shaped to measure that way. If it is egg shaped, can it be remediated? Thanks in advance for educating me.
I'm completely new to machining, so keep that in mind when I ask silly questions or make false assumptions please.
I bought a 1950s SB 10k at an estate sale this year. Because the previous owner was deceased and I couldn't get history on it, I picked up a guide to renovation on eBay and disassembled it to clean it and replace felts. I followed the manual closely for disassembly and reassembly. It's back together now and everything works.
The problem is that I think the spindle is too far out of true. With a dial test indicator on the flange, I get a variance of .0085 when I turn the spindle. When I put a piece of small round stock in the chuck, I get .0055. As mentioned, I'm no expert, but this seems like a lot to me, even for hobby stuff.
Some questions: this is too much variance, right? Anyone know the cause/solution? Seems like the spindle would have to be egg shaped to measure that way. If it is egg shaped, can it be remediated? Thanks in advance for educating me.