Lathe compound slide vs surface plate

C

Cadillac

Registered
Registered
Joined
Mar 12, 2018
Messages
2,420
So I needed to remove my compound to get some measurements for a solid tool post block I'm building. Note I don't have any problems with the lathe cutting just a project and I like to verify stuff makes me sleep better. Surface plate was cleaned so I figured why not. A real eye opener on contact area on matting surfaces. Background it's a 14x40 optimum lathe built in 2013. Here's some pics.
290618290619290620290621290622
I pulled out the tenths indicator and did some mapping of the parts. Every surface was tweaked falling .002 the most on the bottom dovetail mount towards the operator. The gibb had a .005 smiley face in it and a slight twist. The bottom base had a rock in it,the top slide was surprisingly the best shape but the top where the qctp mounts had a terrible matting surface.
I first looked at how to straighten the gibb I found that pinging it with a convexed body hammer with a piece of copper in between worked a charm. I now can lay on the surface plate and barely see light touching at the ends. Figure scraping it in will take care of the rest. Then I started by flattening the mounting surface of the compound. Side note this is my first real scraping job that isn't playing around. I don't have a clue but seems straight forward I need 100% contact and stay level right. After about ten trips back and fourth I got these results.
290624290625290626290627
I've got the bottom down to where I'm pretty happy about 95% there so I moved on to the top surface where the tool post mounts. This surface had maybe 30% contact and its was around the perimeter not where the tool post sits. It took acouple passes I'm not satisfied as it has a .0002 hole in it. Getting there though I think.
290635
The bottom of this surface looks like it was either milled or a ruff Blanchard grind. It was not scrapped but was in good shape otherwise only .0004 variance in readings. I need to make myself a prismatic straight edge for the dovetails and work myself up to it. The lower male dovetail was the worst having a .002 difference from front to back good thing is it was even left to right so I need to tilt the base to level it out. It isn't scrapped just some flaking/makeup on it. All in all I'm happy with the results so far alittle disappointed in the finding but figured it's only gonna get better from here. Like said I had no problem with surface finishes or sizing just some curiosity. Would love to see what a bad machine would look like? If you have a surface plate and some time it may be a eye opener to go check out some parts. More results in time thanks for looking.

image.jpg
 
Nice to see someone check out their machine properly...

Nice that you are correcting what you find! You treat your machines right. bravo!
 
You mean the test report that came with the lathe wasn't enough proof?
290652290653

Can barely read the chicken scratch and always just below tolerance AWESOME! Guys arm must be numb from the stacks he's has to do in a day.:disgust:
Here's a pic of what the surface finishes are when disassembled just machined and some glitter. I did a quick blue not very surprised. The left bottom corner had alittle more on it I accidentally grabbed the surface and my fat thumb wipe it off. Right side ain't bad left side touches about a 1" on the ends, along the gib and a touch in the center. No buena.
290656290657
Will get it dialed in just gonna take alittle love and a lot of effort!
 
please tell us what impact your work has on the operation of the lathe.
 
Here’s a pic of the gibb. .005 bow shown on plate with light ,First blue and where I’m at now. Got it pretty flat good thing is the curve will be opposite the slide lock so it will actually straighten when locked. I was really surprised at how much it moved by pinging the backside. Can already see movement in gibb adjustment screws.
290888290887290889
My goal is to get the handles to spin freely like I see Stephan G on YouTube. Watching him do his magic and showing how smooth the compound moves with NO play, tight,and right. Using a tenths indicator checking side play and having the needle not move dam he’s good. I’ll keep ya updated.
 
This is actually a huge plus. Having tight uniform travel just makes the experience so much more positive. And, hitting a loose spot in the carriage feed while parting can be destructive. Of course, one can just stop and adjust, stop and adjust, stop and adjust, ..., but if you forget, the rotating part can grab the parting tool and self feed against the backlash. It is aesthetics, but also functionality.
 
Did you have to cut a relief into the dovetail or did it already have one?
 
Not sure I fully understand the pictures in the first post, but you don’t want too much coverage on any mating parts that move. Maybe 60% bearing (or coverage, if I understand you correctly) is plenty. The low spots (not showing blue) are there to hold some lubricants, too much contact or coverage or bearing leads to premature wear. Or maybe I mis-understand what you are trying to do, but thought I’d mention it just in case.
 
eeler1 said:
Not sure I fully understand the pictures in the first post, but you don’t want too much coverage on any mating parts that move. Maybe 60% bearing (or coverage, if I understand you correctly) is plenty. The low spots (not showing blue) are there to hold some lubricants, too much contact or coverage or bearing leads to premature wear. Or maybe I mis-understand what you are trying to do, but thought I’d mention it just in case.
Click to expand...

The only parts that I want 100% contact is the bottom mounting surface of the compound and the top surface where the qctp mounts.

I have not relieved any of the dovetails, they have reliefs cut in already. I'm at a stand still with the dovetails anyways I do not have a dovetail straight edge yet. Gonna have to be a near future project.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top