1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. PLEASE: Read the FORUM RULES BEFORE registering!

    Dismiss Notice

Adding steppers to LC-30 mill: direct or belt drive?

Discussion in 'CNC IN THE HOME SHOP' started by slow-poke, Jul 6, 2017.

  1. slow-poke

    slow-poke Canada Active Member Active Member

    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    8
    City:
    Toronto
    State:
    Ontario

    -Return to Top-

    As the title states, the steppers are 900 oz-in, speed is not a primary concern, having enough torque is my main concern. I also think it might be easier to implement with a short clogged belt with the motors just to the side of the hand cranks. I would imagine I can get a 2:1 (or better) increase in torque with a belt system.

    If anyone has implemented CNC on a Long Chang mill I would really like to see how the conversion was done?
     
  2. Eddyde

    Eddyde Active User H-M Supporter-Premium

    Likes Received:
    401
    Trophy Points:
    63
    City:
    Brooklyn
    State:
    New York

    -Return to Top-

    I have a Mill made by Long Chang, it was marketed as RB-1 (LC 50) by a Swiss company Siber Hegner. They were also sold under the brand name "First". I am currently working to CNC it, albeit slowly... I went with servos, 1125 oz in. I haven't mounted them yet but they seem plenty strong for the task, I had researched the motor needed for CNC-ing a Bridgeport and that size was the upper range what was suggested. What are the specs of your mill, Do you have any pictures?
    Here's a link to when I got my mill for reference: http://www.hobby-machinist.com/threads/new-siber-hegner-rb-1-milling-machine.37875/
     
    slow-poke likes this.
  3. slow-poke

    slow-poke Canada Active Member Active Member

    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    8
    City:
    Toronto
    State:
    Ontario

    -Return to Top-

    Picture of my smaller, cheaper, older LC-30 Mill
     

    Attached Files:

    Eddyde likes this.
  4. RJSakowski

    RJSakowski H-M Supporter - Premium Content H-M Supporter-Premium

    Likes Received:
    2,418
    Trophy Points:
    113
    City:
    Barneveld
    State:
    Wisconsin

    -Return to Top-

    I would use direct drive. Any additional components added to a drive train add backlash and/or lost motion.
     
    TomS likes this.
  5. RJSakowski

    RJSakowski H-M Supporter - Premium Content H-M Supporter-Premium

    Likes Received:
    2,418
    Trophy Points:
    113
    City:
    Barneveld
    State:
    Wisconsin

    -Return to Top-

    My Tormach 770 has 500 oz-in steppers and more than enough torque to do serious damage in a crash. If you feel you need mechanical advantage, on way would be to use a lower pitch lead/ball screw. The 770 ball screw has a 4mm pitch.
     
    slow-poke likes this.
  6. Eddyde

    Eddyde Active User H-M Supporter-Premium

    Likes Received:
    401
    Trophy Points:
    63
    City:
    Brooklyn
    State:
    New York

    -Return to Top-

    Looks like a nice mill, I know Long Chang make quality machines. I agree with RJ, your steppers should be plenty powerful even in direct drive, However, you may want to do a pulley timing belt arrangement to get the motor(s) out of the way, I don't think you'll add much if any backlash.
     
    slow-poke likes this.
  7. slow-poke

    slow-poke Canada Active Member Active Member

    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    8
    City:
    Toronto
    State:
    Ontario

    -Return to Top-

    That's what I was thinking, also a belt arrangement is more forgiving for slight errors in alignment. Apparently UPS has lost my package (steppers), so when they do finally arrive, I will size up how I will mount them. Fun project!
     

Share This Page