Starrett No. 113 mismark?

S

sambo

Registered
Registered
Has any one ever seen a Starrett no. 3 or a no.113 with a anvil cutout as shown? It looks exactly like a no. 231 only marked 113. All the no. 3 and 113's I've seen have the squared off frame. Maybe a mismark? Seems to date about 1909 -1916. Hope the picts came thru OK, I'm new at this.

$_57 (5).jpg $_57 (6).jpg
 
Yes, I have the same exact one. I will check my early 1900's catalog.....

sam


I'm also thinking its pre 1900 but I will check
 
sambo said:
Has any one ever seen a Starrett no. 3 or a no.113 with a anvil cutout as shown? It looks exactly like a no. 231 only marked 113. All the no. 3 and 113's I've seen have the squared off frame. Maybe a mismark? Seems to date about 1909 -1916. Hope the picts came thru OK, I'm new at this.
Click to expand...
I don't know, sorry, I was curious to know what is in the envelope though ?
Regards
Robert.
 
GK1918 said:
Yes, I have the same exact one. I will check my early 1900's catalog.....

sam


I'm also thinking its pre 1900 but I will check
Click to expand...
Thanks Sam, I should have posted a picture of the other side. The last patent date is Dec. 19, 1907, but upon examination, I noticed that the later patent of July 20, 1909 was actually used. I have most of the early catalogs of this period but don't see any #3's or 113's with this cutout. I believe, but am not positive, that the cutout feature appeared about 1909. It was introduced with the #230 & 231. I was impressed by this mike because it was in such outstanding condition. Looks unused! The original Morocco case is very nice as well. Thanks for your input. Sam (sambo)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top