- Joined
- Sep 14, 2014
- Messages
- 610
Hi all. First TIA in recognition of your time and experience. This is my first backing plate. May be too much information not needed, but I've tried to cover everything I found on the subject trying to educate myself to minimize questions.
I'm working with a Bostar 5C collet chuck for a Logan 820 10" lathe. The spindle is 1-1/2 8 tpi with a .25" un-threaded portion of the spindle often called the register and a .75" threaded part. The .25" vs .1875" un-threaded common on a Souhbend often trips people up when they buy an eBay chuck. FWIW, I measured my Logan 4 jaw and the un-threaded portion has a diameter of 1.513." You can argue with a 4 jaw any un-threaded portion is irrelevant but .013" is a long way from .002" Ops, mine is bigger than that.
Comment. A personal opinion, after reading as many forum posts as I could find, about the so called "register." I suspect over the years "shoulder" dropped of what should be the "register shoulder" leading to much confusion over how the backing plate is made square to the spindle. Just my $.02 .
First I checked the spindle shoulder. Dead flat (yeah!).
After my attempts at an internal close fit mandrel and spacer turned into several entries into the "box of blunders" I chose to get precision spacers from McMaster-Carr to cover the un-threaded portion of the spindle.
I covered the un-threaded part of the spindle with the spacers, did a skim cut on the headstock side of the backing plate. Dead flat.
Reversed the backing plate and did a skim cut on the non-register portion of the backing plate. Again dead flat.
When I mounted the chuck on the backing plate, it would not pull tight. In retrospect, I think I should have tried freezing the backing plate. Oh well, next time.
To the point, trying to skim cut the centering shoulder, I ended up cutting a taper. When I cleaned that up, I have an interface gap of .0025 to .003." Having read of purposely not having an interference of "0" and tapping the backing and chuck into alignment, I figured I could probably live with this.
Except the chuck TIR is not what I expected from a collet chuck and to me is pretty is bad. Worse than the AT & 3C adapters and collets I intended to replace because they have ~ .002 to .003" TIR.
I marked each of the bolt holes and checked the TIR rotating the chuck through each position starting at bolt position #1. Tapping on the chuck made zero differance.
1: +.0065 to -.005" or .015 TIR.
2 : -.0075" TIR
3:+.006 to -.005 or .011 TIR.
If this isn't a "as good as it gets" situation, I'm open to any ideas including re-cutting the shoulder.
Final question. Any harm in reducing the length of the headstock side of the backing plate to reduce over hang?
TIA
Ron
I'm working with a Bostar 5C collet chuck for a Logan 820 10" lathe. The spindle is 1-1/2 8 tpi with a .25" un-threaded portion of the spindle often called the register and a .75" threaded part. The .25" vs .1875" un-threaded common on a Souhbend often trips people up when they buy an eBay chuck. FWIW, I measured my Logan 4 jaw and the un-threaded portion has a diameter of 1.513." You can argue with a 4 jaw any un-threaded portion is irrelevant but .013" is a long way from .002" Ops, mine is bigger than that.
Comment. A personal opinion, after reading as many forum posts as I could find, about the so called "register." I suspect over the years "shoulder" dropped of what should be the "register shoulder" leading to much confusion over how the backing plate is made square to the spindle. Just my $.02 .
First I checked the spindle shoulder. Dead flat (yeah!).
After my attempts at an internal close fit mandrel and spacer turned into several entries into the "box of blunders" I chose to get precision spacers from McMaster-Carr to cover the un-threaded portion of the spindle.
I covered the un-threaded part of the spindle with the spacers, did a skim cut on the headstock side of the backing plate. Dead flat.
Reversed the backing plate and did a skim cut on the non-register portion of the backing plate. Again dead flat.
When I mounted the chuck on the backing plate, it would not pull tight. In retrospect, I think I should have tried freezing the backing plate. Oh well, next time.
To the point, trying to skim cut the centering shoulder, I ended up cutting a taper. When I cleaned that up, I have an interface gap of .0025 to .003." Having read of purposely not having an interference of "0" and tapping the backing and chuck into alignment, I figured I could probably live with this.
Except the chuck TIR is not what I expected from a collet chuck and to me is pretty is bad. Worse than the AT & 3C adapters and collets I intended to replace because they have ~ .002 to .003" TIR.
I marked each of the bolt holes and checked the TIR rotating the chuck through each position starting at bolt position #1. Tapping on the chuck made zero differance.
1: +.0065 to -.005" or .015 TIR.
2 : -.0075" TIR
3:+.006 to -.005 or .011 TIR.
If this isn't a "as good as it gets" situation, I'm open to any ideas including re-cutting the shoulder.
Final question. Any harm in reducing the length of the headstock side of the backing plate to reduce over hang?
TIA
Ron
Last edited: