Here is the use case:
I have to tap 48 blind holes 1/4 x 20 in 6061 aluminum. The holes are drilled about 25% deeper than what needs to be tapped.
Tools available:
I have a drill press with a Tapmatic head, A9 tapping fluid and both an OSG two flute spiral point tap and an OSG three flute spiral bottoming tap. The point tap is not long enough to put threads as far down the hole as are needed. The bottoming tap does create threads far enough down the hole.
Conundrum:
It seem like there are two possible ways to move forward.
The first is to tap all the holes using the point tap, clean the chips out the holes as best I can and then go over them again with the bottoming tap. The advantage would be considerably less strain on the bottoming tap as it only has to cut a small percentage of the threads. The disadvantage is the extra work of cleaning the holes and going over all of them a second time along with the concern that the Tapmatic and the bottoming tap will actually pick up the existing threads and not try to create new ones. [side note: a few experiments with scrap suggests it actually will pick up the existing threads but the research was not exhaustive enough to determine if that was the norm or just luck]
The alternative is to skip the point tap and just go with the bottoming tap. The advantage is a lot less work. The disadvantage is the stress on the bottoming tap as it cuts 100% of the threads for almost 100% of its length. The thought of having to remove a broken bottoming tap and\or scrapping the workpiece is not high on my list of things to do.
Suggestions? Thoughts? Concerns? Advice?
Thanks,
Arvid
I have to tap 48 blind holes 1/4 x 20 in 6061 aluminum. The holes are drilled about 25% deeper than what needs to be tapped.
Tools available:
I have a drill press with a Tapmatic head, A9 tapping fluid and both an OSG two flute spiral point tap and an OSG three flute spiral bottoming tap. The point tap is not long enough to put threads as far down the hole as are needed. The bottoming tap does create threads far enough down the hole.
Conundrum:
It seem like there are two possible ways to move forward.
The first is to tap all the holes using the point tap, clean the chips out the holes as best I can and then go over them again with the bottoming tap. The advantage would be considerably less strain on the bottoming tap as it only has to cut a small percentage of the threads. The disadvantage is the extra work of cleaning the holes and going over all of them a second time along with the concern that the Tapmatic and the bottoming tap will actually pick up the existing threads and not try to create new ones. [side note: a few experiments with scrap suggests it actually will pick up the existing threads but the research was not exhaustive enough to determine if that was the norm or just luck]
The alternative is to skip the point tap and just go with the bottoming tap. The advantage is a lot less work. The disadvantage is the stress on the bottoming tap as it cuts 100% of the threads for almost 100% of its length. The thought of having to remove a broken bottoming tap and\or scrapping the workpiece is not high on my list of things to do.
Suggestions? Thoughts? Concerns? Advice?
Thanks,
Arvid