Surface Grinder Restoration Complete. With pics!

jgedde

Active User
Registered
After two plus months of work, the Boyar Schultz grinder I picked up for $500 is restored and up and running... I put about another $400 into it for paint, hardware, cleaning supplies, VFD, seals, etc. The hydraulic feeds for both X and Y axes are fully functional and leak free.

I just need to get a length of suitable 3" dust collector hose and fabricate a collector scoop to go on the mount on the left side of the wheel guard...

John

Here it is as I got it:
still on the trailer.jpg

Here it is now in the shop:
restored.jpg

The VFD:
VFD Box.jpg

6X18 Chuck After regrind:
6x8 chuck after grinding.jpg


And some miscellaneous closeups:

challenger deluxe.jpgcollectpr.jpgdc label.jpghydraulic pump.jpglabel.jpgmotorized one shot lubricator.jpgswitch.jpgx axis control.jpgy axis controls.jpg

still on the trailer.jpg restored.jpg VFD Box.jpg 6x8 chuck after grinding.jpg challenger deluxe.jpg collectpr.jpg dc label.jpg hydraulic pump.jpg label.jpg motorized one shot lubricator.jpg switch.jpg x axis control.jpg y axis controls.jpg
 
Looks great! Nothing better than a freshly ground chuck.



Well, there may be a couple of better things.:thinking:
 
Well done John. Looks very slick. Only problem is that it's making me start to pine for one. :drool:

-Ron
 
John.
Another outstanding project this month. That machine looks brand new. Tha little extras like the dataplate sure do show up nicely. Absolutely flawless and much better looking than when you started. That should give you a lot of great years of really nice surface ground items. I'm definately jealous now, too.
Bob
 
Nice work John.

Your back rail should have some kind of space between it and the chuck. This prevents the formation of a lump as the chuck wears in response to sliding parts up against the rail. It also provides a place for swarf to escape. Either of these two examples work well.

Gene

BACKRAIL2.jpg
 
Nice work John.

Your back rail should have some kind of space between it and the chuck. This prevents the formation of a lump as the chuck wears in response to sliding parts up against the rail. It also provides a place for swarf to escape. Either of these two examples work well.

Gene

It's invisible in the photo, but I used a flaring cup wheel installed facing backwards to surface the back rail. You can still see the cup wheel on the spindle... The cup wheel was beveled away from the contact axes in Z and Y.

The Z axis bevel is so that the back plate get's ground with minimum wheel contact (to avoid burning).

the Y axis bevel is so I could feed the cup wheel down in Z below the plane of the chuck top to create a beveled relief along the back of the chuck. This was to ensure something square can really bank on the backplate by eliminating any issues due to a radius on the grinding wheel edge. In other words, so it didn't round off the inside corner between the chuck and the back plate.

This also gives small particles a place to go when something is banked on the back stop.

John
 
John,
Does the motor reverse on this machine? Or is it just set up to spin the wheel in one direction only. I dont have any idea why I am asking, other then maybe a posibility in the difference of the surface finish. I am still marveling at the great job you did on this machine too. Your def. way up there in the craftsman range in my book. Beautifull, clean and well detailed, just plain beautifull work......again.
Bob
 
John,
Does the motor reverse on this machine? Or is it just set up to spin the wheel in one direction only. I dont have any idea why I am asking, other then maybe a posibility in the difference of the surface finish. I am still marveling at the great job you did on this machine too. Your def. way up there in the craftsman range in my book. Beautifull, clean and well detailed, just plain beautifull work......again.
Bob


Thanks for the good words Bob!

In answer to your question, the spindle motor is a standard three phase AC motor. Thus it's reversable by swapping two leads. Or, I can do it in the VFD.

But, I wouldn't for two reasons:

1) Running the wheel backwards no longer allows the wheel adapter and spindle nut to be self tightening. A safety issue.
2) The other two motors (hydraulic pump and dust collector) would also run backwards if I reversed the VFD.

Getting a bit off subject: There is a theory that a VFD cannot drive more than one motor. This is not always true depending on how the VFD is to be used. In my case, its doing nothing more than phase conversion: 220V 1 phase in, 220V 3 phase out.

In my VFD, I'm not using space vector pwm mode, slip compensation, PID, or any feature that would preclude its use for multiple motors I can drive all three big motors (and the small shaded pole lubricator motor) off of one VFD. Also, in the grinder, I have no big inertias to accelerate. So I have no worries about simultaneous startup of the three units. The 1.5 kW VFD I'm using starts all three motors at once with no issues - even if I throw the switch on the grinder instead of using the VFD acceleration profile to start....

According to the VFD readout. the spindle motor takes 0.1A no load, with up to 1.5A during heavy grinding. The hydraulic pump takes 1.5A continuously, and the dust collector takes 1.2A (drops a bit when a hose is installed). I'm not sure how this is being done since the currents are lower than I expected. But, there is a current transformer on the rectified line voltage used as a HV DC supply voltage inside the VFD used to generate the outputs. There is no output current sensing apparent in the circuit.

I had to reverse engineer the output stage in the VFD out of simple curiousity since I design motor controllers for a living.... By the way, our motors and gearboxes are on the Curiousity rover that just landed on Mars. We provided actuators and microelectronics (IC's and stuff) for virtually all required movements: wheels, steering, robotic arm, etc... I did not design the motor controllers in the rover itself but was on the independant design review team. JPL did the elelctronics design in house.

The Mars Reconaissance Orbiter satellite relaying pictures back to earth does have motion controller that I worked on.

Getting back to the VFD, what I do know is single phase input current when the VFD reads 4A, is over 8A since it blew the fuses I used on the incoming line! Since the remaining 4A+ required to blow the fuses is going somewhere external (the VFD runs very cool), I suspect the motor current readout on the CFD isn't the whole picture.

John
 
Back
Top