I have a 1945 SB 9a that is in good condition. I have been trying to machine some parts to tolerance and not getting the results I was hoping for. The major reason is my skill level, but in order to ensure I had a good understanding of the machine I have been taking some measurements. I have discovered some measurements that I would like to address. The first is a discrepancy between work that is held in a three jaw chuck and work that is held in an arbor in the spindle.
I am using a length of 1/2 tool steel rod in the chuck and in the arbor to measure spindle run out. Interesting the dial indicator measurement in the chuck is +/- 1.5 thousands in the chuck and +/- 5 thousands in the arbor. This is not what I expected.
I suspect the MT3 arbor is the issue. The surface is pitted and may not be seating properly. Can this arbor be resurfaced? Can it be done on this lathe?
If so what is the best way? I have seen two methods mentioned. One is to offset the tail stock and second is to use the compound feed. Which way will most likely produce the best results?
I am using a length of 1/2 tool steel rod in the chuck and in the arbor to measure spindle run out. Interesting the dial indicator measurement in the chuck is +/- 1.5 thousands in the chuck and +/- 5 thousands in the arbor. This is not what I expected.
I suspect the MT3 arbor is the issue. The surface is pitted and may not be seating properly. Can this arbor be resurfaced? Can it be done on this lathe?
If so what is the best way? I have seen two methods mentioned. One is to offset the tail stock and second is to use the compound feed. Which way will most likely produce the best results?