Hobby-Machinist / PM727V users: Using the fine quill downfeed on my new PM727V I am seeing increasingly imprecise readings on the fine downfeed control handwheel. I double checked the manual for correct operation, actually noticing for usage of the fine downfeed: "For milling operations calling for precise, repeatable control of tool depth..."
Well, it's not very precise. I emailed Precision Matthews and they replied that the fine feed dial inaccuracy is "...not surprising at all. This is why the quill is equipped with a digital DRO as well. Handwheel dials are always going to be approximate."
I've attached images of the DRO and fine feed dial readings. DRO is acceptably pretty darn precise with my indicator, but the handwheel dial shows increasing readings.
For my test measurements I checked 0.080" increments (which should show "0" on my PM727V fine control dial for every test revolution) at 0.080", 0.160", 0.240", 0.320" and 0.400" as follows:
#1: Indicator 0.000", Handwheel 0.0000", DRO 0.0000" (DRO +0.000, Handwheel +0.000")
#2: Indicator 0.080", Handwheel 0.0820", DRO 0.0795" (DRO -0.0005, Handwheel +0.002")
#3: Indicator 0.160", Handwheel 0.1655", DRO 0.1595" (DRO -0.0005, Handwheel +0.005")
#4: Indicator 0.240", Handwheel 0.2470", DRO 0.2400" (DRO +0.0000, Handwheel +0.007")
#5: Indicator 0.320", Handwheel 0.3280", DRO 0.3185" (DRO -0.0015, Handwheel +0.008")
#6: Indicator 0.400", Handwheel 0.4100", DRO 0.3990" (DRO -0.001, Handwheel +0.010")
I've taken these measurements numerous time and the results are extremely repeatable. Do other PM727V users see similar handwheel control dial results? I know Precision Matthews told me this is to be expected, it's just that I didn't expect this. I've used other mills (pre-DRO) whose analog dial readings are much closer than these. Am I asking too much of my PM727V analog fine control? Please correct/advise/reprimand me, THANKS!
Craig
Well, it's not very precise. I emailed Precision Matthews and they replied that the fine feed dial inaccuracy is "...not surprising at all. This is why the quill is equipped with a digital DRO as well. Handwheel dials are always going to be approximate."
I've attached images of the DRO and fine feed dial readings. DRO is acceptably pretty darn precise with my indicator, but the handwheel dial shows increasing readings.
For my test measurements I checked 0.080" increments (which should show "0" on my PM727V fine control dial for every test revolution) at 0.080", 0.160", 0.240", 0.320" and 0.400" as follows:
#1: Indicator 0.000", Handwheel 0.0000", DRO 0.0000" (DRO +0.000, Handwheel +0.000")
#2: Indicator 0.080", Handwheel 0.0820", DRO 0.0795" (DRO -0.0005, Handwheel +0.002")
#3: Indicator 0.160", Handwheel 0.1655", DRO 0.1595" (DRO -0.0005, Handwheel +0.005")
#4: Indicator 0.240", Handwheel 0.2470", DRO 0.2400" (DRO +0.0000, Handwheel +0.007")
#5: Indicator 0.320", Handwheel 0.3280", DRO 0.3185" (DRO -0.0015, Handwheel +0.008")
#6: Indicator 0.400", Handwheel 0.4100", DRO 0.3990" (DRO -0.001, Handwheel +0.010")
I've taken these measurements numerous time and the results are extremely repeatable. Do other PM727V users see similar handwheel control dial results? I know Precision Matthews told me this is to be expected, it's just that I didn't expect this. I've used other mills (pre-DRO) whose analog dial readings are much closer than these. Am I asking too much of my PM727V analog fine control? Please correct/advise/reprimand me, THANKS!
Craig