"That's what the thread chart for the Grizzly G0773 indicates, as well as the chart for the Seig SC10"
I think that's the answer, then. I really should just print their manual out, since this is about the third time I've run into issues with this one that were corrected on theirs (must be a revision difference). I'd love to see a list of what all is different on these machines from the SC10, because apart from the absence of an oil ball-port over the power-feed mechanism (mine just has a set screw staked in the hole) I haven't found one, yet. Mostly, our machines are simply missing useless add-ons like chuck guards and leadscrew covers (I think the tailstock might be slightly nicer, or at least a newer & larger model with the MT3 taper rather than the MT2 that had been shipping with the SIEGs)
One thing is for sure, though; my machine really doesn't like running with the 30 tooth change gear in play. I've decided there is a bad concentricity issue somewhere at the final drive gear which was causing my cutting issues ('waves' in the cut paths) and with the different gear in position, man does that gearbox howl every time it comes around the tight spot. Regardless what the thread chart says, I'll be doing something else to get this part to work (already did; I simply turned the thread grooves in the Aloris post like .001" wider at the same English pitch, and it now gets deep enough before binding for proper seating; it was like two threads away from the needed engagement, before. Apparently M14 is a place where metric/standard tolerances overlap)
Be advised, I've heard from two people now that the gears in these lathes (SIEG/etc.) have been known to have concentricity issues. Might be worth spinning the gear through its whole travel by hand to check for binding before you damage something. I know for sure my change gears are much, much tighter at the shaft-key slot, which causes them to sit slightly higher at that side of the shaft by the thou or so clearance of the bore.
FWIW, I read the chart as saying "G-Z91-Z90" vs. "G-Z91/Z86-Z90." This still doesn't make sense as there is no way to get the Z90 gear to mesh with the Z86 --the latter precesses around the former on the banjo without getting any closer. Closest you could get is "G-Z86/Z91-Z90" which is what I did to get the desired 1.4mm pitch (which I then found I can't use for worry of breaking the machine). Considering how the "Z91" depiction isn't even close to the same size in the two charts...I think there's a typo somewhere in there. I'm also not sure if it should be considered 'just a typo' for something so basic and crucial as the threading chart to be incorrect --that's simply low-rent crap, right there.
TCB