- Joined
- Feb 17, 2013
- Messages
- 4,409
I just bought a "vintage" Grizzly 12x24 lathe. The current model number is G4002, and indeed the original invoice carries that number ... but the nameplate on this classic (made in Taiwan around 1990) says DF-1224G.
The instruction manual cautions against running the lifting slings around the outside of the bed, as it would bend and ruin the leadscrew. Instead, they said to run the slings through the webs between the ways, as I'm sure is the case with nearly all metal lathes.
Fine ... BUT ... the bed webs are way below the center of gravity of this (or any other) lathe, and the G4002 has a tall and hefty headstock/gearbox. So I decided I needed a way to make the whole arrangement less tippy.
My solution involved a length of common 1/2" steel pipe. I first tapered, smoothed and polished one end of the pipe. I then gave it a wrap or two of gaffer's tape (heavy cloth tape, sort of a high-grade duct tape). I ran the pipe through the spindle and into the tailstock's MT3 taper. It went in about 2-3". The smoothing, etc. was intended to prevent damage inside the taper.
There was about a foot of pipe still in the spindle bore. I snugged up the chuck jaws on the pipe to keep it from slipping out.
Then when I'd placed the slings through the bed webs, I looped both sides of the one nearest the headstock around the pipe (in opposite directions). The drive belts were left loose, so the spindle could turn in response to any uneven pull on the ends of the sling and the pipe wouldn't take any of the lifting load. I didn't loop the tail end sling, just made sure the two ends were on opposite sides of the pipe.
The lathe lifted nicely, and a cheap HF "load leveler" helped keep it nearly level end-to-end.
Yes, this arrangement has a trade-off. It precludes reducing the total weight by removing the chuck and tailstock. Luckily, my engine hoist had plenty of capacity!
The instruction manual cautions against running the lifting slings around the outside of the bed, as it would bend and ruin the leadscrew. Instead, they said to run the slings through the webs between the ways, as I'm sure is the case with nearly all metal lathes.
Fine ... BUT ... the bed webs are way below the center of gravity of this (or any other) lathe, and the G4002 has a tall and hefty headstock/gearbox. So I decided I needed a way to make the whole arrangement less tippy.
My solution involved a length of common 1/2" steel pipe. I first tapered, smoothed and polished one end of the pipe. I then gave it a wrap or two of gaffer's tape (heavy cloth tape, sort of a high-grade duct tape). I ran the pipe through the spindle and into the tailstock's MT3 taper. It went in about 2-3". The smoothing, etc. was intended to prevent damage inside the taper.
There was about a foot of pipe still in the spindle bore. I snugged up the chuck jaws on the pipe to keep it from slipping out.
Then when I'd placed the slings through the bed webs, I looped both sides of the one nearest the headstock around the pipe (in opposite directions). The drive belts were left loose, so the spindle could turn in response to any uneven pull on the ends of the sling and the pipe wouldn't take any of the lifting load. I didn't loop the tail end sling, just made sure the two ends were on opposite sides of the pipe.
The lathe lifted nicely, and a cheap HF "load leveler" helped keep it nearly level end-to-end.
Yes, this arrangement has a trade-off. It precludes reducing the total weight by removing the chuck and tailstock. Luckily, my engine hoist had plenty of capacity!