[Metrology] Dial indicator contact point alignment

woodgeek

Registered
Registered
Joined
Apr 9, 2020
Messages
12
Does this look off to you? Can the alignment be adjusted? It measures fine, I checked with feeler gauges.
475fca02be28b55c2d58392040d491d0.jpg

e9855f0a074ea3dfa6a5375721aa9386.jpg
 
The top photo is perfectly normal. The tip is designed to be moved around the pivot point.
The bottom photo looks like the tip is slightly off but it could just be the photo.
 
Going from zero to .0065" or so there is a shadow of sorts. Leads me to believe it's the angle of the photo making it look bent.
 
Thank you gentlemen. After some investigation, the test point is definitely bent. It is quite obvious when unscrewing it. Now the question is, do I want the $8 steel tipped or $25 carbide tipped test point. lol
 
Thank you gentlemen. After some investigation, the test point is definitely bent. It is quite obvious when unscrewing it. Now the question is, do I want the $8 steel tipped or $25 carbide tipped test point. lol
I have steel tips on my two DTI and never think twice about them. I suppose if you used it all day to centre bores on a mill thus exposing the tip to more wear then carbide would be a good choice but for five times the price that's your call.
 
The bent tip is completely irrelevant. Replace it if you like, but it has no effect on the function of the indicator. Dial test indicators, because the angle of the tip is adjustable, are not used for actual measurement. They are only used for comparison. Dial indicators like this
1682364892039.png
can be used for actual measurement.
 
MrWhoopee can dial test indicators like the one shown be calibrated for linearity or just repeatability. I know the Starrett back plunger test indicators can only be calibrated for repeatability.
 
MrWhoopee can dial test indicators like the one shown be calibrated for linearity or just repeatability. I know the Starrett back plunger test indicators can only be calibrated for repeatability.

That’s great to know. Thank you!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
The test indicator measures a swept arc. They are prone to what machinists oddly call cosine error. I do not agree that it is an error at all, it is a fact of life and is easily resolved in vector components. So it is true that a DTI can't be calibrated for linearity, but there are plenty of ways to write a cal routine for a variety of uses based on knowledge of the instrument.

Most of us use it as an indicator, to indicate and locate a difference, not (necessarily) to quantify one. That's why it is a setup tool, not a measuring tool in principle.

In a way, metrology is the science of mincing words.
 
Back
Top