- Joined
- Dec 20, 2012
- Messages
- 9,422
I've wanted an ER-40 chuck for my Emco Super 11 CD lathe for awhile now. It has a D1-4 mount and until recently, finding a direct mount chuck has been a challenge - you either have to make one from scratch or buy a backing plate and chuck separately and cobble them together and hope for decent concentricity. I looked hard for a US manufacturer but never found one.
One day I saw a 125mm diameter chuck on ebay for $77.51! I thought, "No way is this chuck going to live up to the claim of 0.0002" concentricity. Come on, it's Chinese!" However, I was curious and I have to admit that having a chuck with minimal overhang was sorely tempting so I ordered a 125mm diameter D1-4 ER-40 chuck from HHIP: http://www.ebay.com/sch/hhindt/m.ht...N8IAAOSwT~9WjCDj&rt=nc&_trksid=p2047675.l2562
The chuck is nicely finished, has a nicely ground taper inside and has holes for a Tommy bar on the rim of the chuck. However, the D1 mounting lugs in back were loose! Its almost as if they got the thread wrong. I was going to send it back but figuring the accuracy of the chuck should rely on the mounting taper anyway, I decided to check the concentricity first.
My Emco lathe has zero run out at the spindle and at the registration taper for the mount but I rechecked and verified that this was so. With the chuck locked down there is no visible gap between the mount and the back of the chuck so this was a concern. However, there was absolutely no play when I jiggled it before locking the chuck down so I hoped the chuck was fully registered.
I then checked concentricity in the taper. The manufacturer claims a concentricity of 0.0002" but he was wrong - I got 0.0001" TIR using my Compac 215 GA tenths-reading dial test indicator. I checked the taper in several places and got the same reading. I checked again with the chuck mounted in all three mounting positions and got the same reading.
Using a 1/2" dowel pin in a generic Chinese ER-40 collet and the nut that came with the chuck, I got 0.0007" TIR just past the chuck. My pin is only 1" long and is the most accurate pin I have so I used it. I'm sure if I used a longer rod I would have gotten more TIR but 0.0007" is not bad for a generic collet. I repeated this with an ETM nut and an ETM collet and got 0.0002" TIR. Clearly, better quality collets and nuts make a big difference but under a thou with generic collets is way good enough for the work I do.
Now, I'm all for making my own tools when possible and I admit to being wary of offshore tools in general but I have to say that this chuck was a big surprise. I don't know if the chuck is hardened - I haven't taken a file to it yet - so I do not know how well it will hold up but I figure in a hobby shop it will work just fine.
I cannot wholeheartedly recommend this chuck as I just got it and don't know how it will perform in the long run. I can say that the seller's claim of concentricity is valid and that the chuck is nicely made, especially for the cost. Call me lazy for not making my own chuck but even if I did I doubt I could have beaten this one.
One day I saw a 125mm diameter chuck on ebay for $77.51! I thought, "No way is this chuck going to live up to the claim of 0.0002" concentricity. Come on, it's Chinese!" However, I was curious and I have to admit that having a chuck with minimal overhang was sorely tempting so I ordered a 125mm diameter D1-4 ER-40 chuck from HHIP: http://www.ebay.com/sch/hhindt/m.ht...N8IAAOSwT~9WjCDj&rt=nc&_trksid=p2047675.l2562
The chuck is nicely finished, has a nicely ground taper inside and has holes for a Tommy bar on the rim of the chuck. However, the D1 mounting lugs in back were loose! Its almost as if they got the thread wrong. I was going to send it back but figuring the accuracy of the chuck should rely on the mounting taper anyway, I decided to check the concentricity first.
My Emco lathe has zero run out at the spindle and at the registration taper for the mount but I rechecked and verified that this was so. With the chuck locked down there is no visible gap between the mount and the back of the chuck so this was a concern. However, there was absolutely no play when I jiggled it before locking the chuck down so I hoped the chuck was fully registered.
I then checked concentricity in the taper. The manufacturer claims a concentricity of 0.0002" but he was wrong - I got 0.0001" TIR using my Compac 215 GA tenths-reading dial test indicator. I checked the taper in several places and got the same reading. I checked again with the chuck mounted in all three mounting positions and got the same reading.
Using a 1/2" dowel pin in a generic Chinese ER-40 collet and the nut that came with the chuck, I got 0.0007" TIR just past the chuck. My pin is only 1" long and is the most accurate pin I have so I used it. I'm sure if I used a longer rod I would have gotten more TIR but 0.0007" is not bad for a generic collet. I repeated this with an ETM nut and an ETM collet and got 0.0002" TIR. Clearly, better quality collets and nuts make a big difference but under a thou with generic collets is way good enough for the work I do.
Now, I'm all for making my own tools when possible and I admit to being wary of offshore tools in general but I have to say that this chuck was a big surprise. I don't know if the chuck is hardened - I haven't taken a file to it yet - so I do not know how well it will hold up but I figure in a hobby shop it will work just fine.
I cannot wholeheartedly recommend this chuck as I just got it and don't know how it will perform in the long run. I can say that the seller's claim of concentricity is valid and that the chuck is nicely made, especially for the cost. Call me lazy for not making my own chuck but even if I did I doubt I could have beaten this one.