Thanks for all the ideas, guys. They are all good!
I was out of town all week again, didn't get any chance to catch up in here at all until now.
Chipmaker, no, we're not kidding anyone. You have most likely figured this out already, but some of us just can't leave well enough alone, and we are always looking for ways to make things work better, even if it just means using a different battery system. We're just perpetual tinkerers!
Initially, I will just be using the CR2032 batteries, and see how long they last. If their life seems a little short, another method for providing power might be more convenient, especially if power can be supplied in an uninterruptible fashion. Let's face it, having the batteries go dead in the middle of machining a complex part could prove to be disastrous in some cases. Granted, one can replace the batteries, pick up a reference surface again, and go from there, but that can be a pain the rump. I just think that with a little forethought, a person could improve the existing equipment to make it more dependable and easier to use.
Going back a little further in the thread, as has been pointed out, I already have the iGaging Absolute DROs for my mill. They are a little different that the IGaging Remote DROs and some of the features are different. The Absolutes also have greater accuracy than the Remotes, so I suspect they may be using yet another rate for points per inch on the scales, but that is only a consideration if one intends to use a different display with them. I am not planning on upgrading the display or anything like that. If I have holes to lay out, I can do it in CAD, then dimension them and just use the DRO to place them on the work, no need to program the DRO just to get a pattern of holes in a specific layout. I can see the advantages of such a system, but it is not something I need. I am happy just having the read outs!
DavidH, you mention a sample that you sent. I suspect you mean a photo in an email or PM??